Real Ballistic Gelatin vs Clear Ballistics Gelatin

Published on September 5, 2016
Duration: 7:42

This video compares the performance of Clear Ballistics Gelatin against traditional 10% ballistic gelatin when testing rifle rounds. While Clear Ballistics Gelatin offers advantages in visibility and durability, it can produce significantly different penetration depth results compared to real gelatin, potentially misrepresenting terminal ballistics for defensive ammunition evaluation. The speaker emphasizes that while useful for amateur testing and video content, its discrepancies, particularly in penetration, mean it's not a perfect substitute for properly prepared natural gelatin.

Quick Summary

Clear Ballistics Gelatin offers better visibility and durability for ammo testing videos but can show significantly different penetration depths compared to natural 10% ballistic gelatin, especially with rifle rounds. While expansion and weight retention are often similar, the penetration discrepancies mean it's not a perfect substitute for evaluating defensive ammunition.

Chapters

  1. 00:06Introduction: Clear Gelatin Popularity
  2. 00:26Brass Fetcher's Previous Findings
  3. 00:53Testing Rifle Rounds
  4. 01:04Ammunition Used: Nosler 64gr Bonded Soft Point
  5. 01:54Natural Gelatin Penetration Result
  6. 02:03Clear Gelatin Test Setup
  7. 02:58Clear Gelatin Penetration Result
  8. 03:02Penetration Depth Discrepancy Analysis
  9. 03:37Suitability for Amateur Testing
  10. 03:51Advantages of Clear Gelatin (Visibility, Durability)
  11. 04:02Comparison: Cavity Size, Expansion, Weight Retention
  12. 04:34Bullet Appearance Comparison
  13. 04:48Tearing and Wound Channel Appearance
  14. 05:10Elasticity and Tissue Mimicry
  15. 05:33Perception of Wound Severity
  16. 05:44Need for More Testing
  17. 06:00Conclusion: Penetration Inaccuracies
  18. 06:05Preference for Accurate Medium
  19. 06:11Disclaimer: Ammo for Defense
  20. 06:37Uncut Test Footage
  21. 06:55ARFCOM Discussion Thread
  22. 07:09Call to Action: Like, Comment, Subscribe

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Clear Ballistics Gelatin accurately mimic real ballistic gelatin for all ammunition testing?

While Clear Ballistics Gelatin offers advantages like better visibility and durability, testing with rifle rounds shows it can produce significantly different penetration depths compared to properly prepared 10% natural ballistic gelatin. This discrepancy means it may not always accurately represent terminal ballistics for defensive ammunition evaluation.

What are the advantages of using Clear Ballistics Gelatin for ammo testing videos?

Clear Ballistics Gelatin is easier to see through, allowing viewers to better observe bullet performance within the block. It's also more durable and less prone to tearing than natural gelatin, which can make wound channels appear less severe and potentially closer to how they would look in real tissue.

Can Clear Ballistics Gelatin be used to determine defensive ammunition effectiveness?

The speaker advises caution. While useful for amateur testing and video content, the observed discrepancies in penetration depth with Clear Ballistics Gelatin mean it shouldn't be the sole basis for deciding on defensive ammunition. Professional testing labs are unlikely to adopt it due to these accuracy concerns.

How does Clear Ballistics Gelatin compare to natural gelatin in terms of expansion and weight retention?

Results for maximum expansion, minimum expansion, and weight retention are generally similar between Clear Ballistics Gelatin and natural gelatin. However, slight variations can occur, and the bullets themselves may look and behave slightly differently depending on the medium.

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from ARFCOM News

View all →