Striker Fired Guns UNSAFE & TOO DANGEROUS for Carry!?!

Published on August 31, 2023
Duration: 12:57

The Yankee Marshal argues that striker-fired firearms are inherently less safe for concealed carry due to their lack of safety mechanisms and lighter triggers, increasing the risk of negligent discharges. He contrasts them with double-action/single-action or hammer-fired pistols that offer more layers of safety. The speaker suggests that while striker-fired guns can be made safer with precautions, their design prioritizes speed over safety, which he attributes to industry marketing and cost-saving measures.

Quick Summary

Striker-fired firearms are considered inherently less safe for concealed carry due to their design, which typically lacks manual safeties and features lighter triggers. This reduces the layers of protection between the user and the gun firing, increasing the risk of negligent discharges compared to DA/SA or hammer-fired pistols.

Chapters

  1. 00:11Introduction: Striker Fired Guns Unsafe?
  2. 00:46Recent Discussions on Striker Fired Safety
  3. 01:10Historical Glock NDs with Police
  4. 02:14Why Striker Fired Guns Are Considered Unsafe
  5. 02:50The Human Factor: The Most Unsafe Feature
  6. 03:13Lack of Layers Between User and Firing
  7. 03:43Trigger Snagging During Holstering
  8. 04:00Manual Safeties as Obstacles
  9. 04:33Striker Fires: More Dangerous for Carry
  10. 05:00Safer Carry Options: Heavier Triggers, DA/SA
  11. 05:34Safeties Make You Safer
  12. 05:39Comparing Striker Fire Models (Glock vs. P320)
  13. 06:34Why Striker Fires Are Popular: They're Awesome
  14. 06:53The Role of 'Tacky Tards' and Industry Marketing
  15. 07:04Speed vs. Safety in Firearm Design
  16. 08:04The Need for Instruction on Less Safe Guns
  17. 09:07Manufacturer Profits and Striker Fires
  18. 10:32Bottom Line: Production Costs vs. Safety
  19. 10:43Real-World Need for Speed vs. Safety
  20. 11:09Conclusion: Striker Fires Are Inherently Less Safe
  21. 11:50Final Thoughts on Carrying Striker Fired Guns

Frequently Asked Questions

Are striker-fired guns inherently unsafe for concealed carry?

The speaker argues that striker-fired guns are inherently less safe for concealed carry due to fewer safety mechanisms and lighter triggers, increasing the risk of negligent discharges compared to other firearm types.

What makes striker-fired firearms more dangerous than other types?

Striker-fired firearms are considered more dangerous because they lack multiple layers of safety, such as manual safeties or heavy double-action triggers, meaning a simple trigger press can cause them to fire.

Why do manufacturers produce so many striker-fired firearms?

Manufacturers often produce striker-fired firearms because they are cheaper to manufacture, leading to higher profit margins, and they align with a market trend emphasizing speed and 'tacticool' aesthetics.

What are safer alternatives to striker-fired guns for concealed carry?

For those prioritizing safety, alternatives include firearms with heavier triggers, double-action/single-action mechanisms, or manual safeties, as these provide additional obstacles against accidental firing.

Related News

All News →

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from TheYankeeMarshal

View all →