US KEVLAR HELMET VS CHINESE KEVLAR HELMET (ALIN ANG TINATABLAN?)

Published on August 20, 2023
Duration: 17:23

This video conducts a comparative ballistic test between a US Army IHPS (Integrated Head Protection System) helmet and a Chinese-made helmet, evaluating their performance against various calibers including .22 LR, 9mm, .44 Magnum, and 5.56x45mm rifle rounds at different distances. The testing focuses on penetration and backface deformation, crucial metrics for helmet survivability. The instructor notes that while helmets are not typically rated for rifle rounds, they can offer protection at longer ranges or oblique angles.

Quick Summary

Ballistic testing comparing US Army IHPS and ECH helmets against a Chinese helmet revealed similar performance against 9mm rounds. While generally not rated for rifle rounds, helmets can offer protection at longer ranges or oblique angles by deflecting or catching projectiles, though lethal backface deformation remains a concern.

Chapters

  1. 00:01Introduction: Rifle vs. Helmet
  2. 00:04Chinese Helmet Introduction
  3. 01:09Testing Setup and Calibers
  4. 01:40Helmet Certification Standards (NIJ Level IIIA)
  5. 02:26Comparing IHPS and ECH Helmets
  6. 04:10Initiating Ballistic Testing
  7. 04:54.22 LR Test Results and Backface Deformation
  8. 05:529mm Test: Sanhawk vs. ECH
  9. 07:33.44 Magnum Test
  10. 08:06.44 Magnum Impact Analysis
  11. 10:15Stepping Up to Rifle Rounds
  12. 10:46AKM Rifle Round Test
  13. 11:28ECH Helmet vs. Rifle Round (Close Range)
  14. 12:05IHPS Helmet vs. Rifle Round (Close Range)
  15. 13:015.56x45mm Test at 300 Meters
  16. 13:41Analysis of 5.56x45mm Performance
  17. 14:43Summary of Rifle Round Saves
  18. 15:06Helmet Certification Recap
  19. 16:00Instructor's Disclaimer

Frequently Asked Questions

How do US Army IHPS and ECH helmets compare to Chinese helmets in ballistic testing?

In ballistic tests, the US Army IHPS and ECH helmets showed comparable performance to a Chinese-made helmet against 9mm rounds, with similar backface deformation. The IHPS demonstrated slightly better performance against .22 LR rounds, with the Chinese helmet showing a round skip.

What is the significance of backface deformation in ballistic helmet testing?

Backface deformation is crucial because even if a helmet stops a projectile, excessive inward caving can still cause lethal brain trauma. Minimizing this deformation is key to a helmet's survivability rating.

Are ballistic helmets designed to stop rifle rounds?

Ballistic helmets are generally not rated for direct rifle rounds at close range. However, they can offer protection by catching or deflecting rounds at longer distances or from oblique angles, potentially preventing lethal injury.

What calibers were used in the ballistic comparison of US and Chinese helmets?

The ballistic comparison included testing against .22 LR, 9mm, .44 Magnum, and 5.56x45mm rifle rounds. These tests were conducted at various distances to assess penetration and deformation.

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from Harold Cabunoc

View all →