Videos tagged with Doxxing

This video details the legal fight by the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and NRA to protect gun owner privacy against potential exposure through litigation. It highlights concerns that disclosing customer information, especially regarding firearm issues, could lead to doxxing, harassment, and the creation of de facto registries, undermining Second Amendment rights and discouraging owners from reporting safety concerns. The discussion emphasizes the importance of privacy as a component of the Second Amendment and existing legislative protections.

This ARFCOM News episode discusses the ATF's actions regarding ghost guns and alleged illegal gun possession. It highlights a case in Hy Park, NY, where a homeless man was arrested for a ghost gun, raising questions about 3D printer access. The segment also criticizes the ATF's perceived double standards in enforcement, contrasting their swift action against individuals with their alleged inaction on gun theft reported by FFLs. Furthermore, it touches upon the potential dangers of an ATF gun registry being compromised, drawing parallels to a data leak affecting Israeli citizens.

This video discusses recent legal and political developments impacting gun owners. It covers a California judge's decision allowing COVID-based closures of gun stores and ranges, a Massachusetts man's arrest for modifying a starter pistol, and House Democrats' renewed demand for a 1000% excise tax on "assault weapons." The video also highlights the doxxing of registered gun owners in New Zealand. Sponsor links for Springfield Armory and TNVC are included.

This YouTube Shorts video discusses the perceived doxxing of gun owners by "anti-gunners" and the government. It promotes various platforms for supporting the channel, including Subscribestar, Utreon, and Patreon, and encourages viewers to join their Discord server. The description also includes affiliate links for merchandise like T-shirts and stickers, as well as links related to 3D printing, gun control literature, and humorous items like a 'Magic ATF Ball.' The video aims to engage viewers interested in Second Amendment rights and gun ownership discussions.

This video, titled "069: Administrative Results on Humor, Culture, and Community," appears to be an episode from a show called "Administrative Results." The description indicates a discussion about April First humor, venturing into the unknown, the internet's new frontier, and the cultural ramifications of doxxing. It also mentions the show's presence on Instagram and provides links to their Linktree, support page, and merchandise. While the title and description do not explicitly mention firearms, the show's name and the context of internet culture discussions could potentially lead to tangential topics that might involve or be related to firearms, particularly within certain online communities.

This video addresses the recent doxxing of individuals listed in the California CCW database. The host provides a link to a form that aims to help those affected preserve their right to sue California. The description also includes numerous links to the host's various channels, merchandise, email list, and sponsorship opportunities, covering a wide range of content from firearms training and Second Amendment advocacy to Christian vlogs.

This entry details a significant legal victory where a California judge halted the state's attempt to doxx gun and ammunition owners via Assembly Bill 173. It also includes a crucial correction regarding the ATF's pistol stabilizing brace rule, emphasizing that brace removal alone may not suffice to avoid SBR classification due to the ATF Worksheet 4999. The content highlights the importance of legal advocacy groups like the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) in protecting Second Amendment rights.

This video discusses a concerning situation where CBS may have obtained a list of Riverside County CCW holders, raising fears of doxxing. It also highlights a legal victory for gun owners as a judge issued an injunction against a California law requiring data sharing of gun owner information in the case Barba v. Bonta. The video also includes promotional segments for various products and services.

This video provides a critical update on a massive gun owner data leak in California, initially believed to be localized to Los Angeles County but now confirmed to be statewide. The breach, spanning from 2011-2021, affects numerous databases including CCW applications, Assault Weapon Registries, and Handgun certifications. The speaker highlights concerns that legislation like Assembly Bill 173 could exacerbate privacy issues by providing access to this sensitive information for research purposes, potentially fueling gun control agendas.

This video discusses a significant data breach by the California Department of Justice, where personal information of gun owners, including those with concealed carry permits, was publicly exposed. The incident occurred shortly after a court ruling invalidated certain gun laws, raising concerns about government competence or malfeasance and the risks associated with centralized gun registries.

This video discusses a lawsuit filed by the NRA-ILA against California to protect the privacy of gun owners. The lawsuit challenges a law (Assembly Bill 173) that allows the state to disclose sensitive personal information of firearm owners to universities and research institutes. This information includes names, addresses, birthplaces, phone numbers, occupations, ID numbers, race, sex, physical characteristics, social security numbers, and firearm types. The NRA argues this is a violation of privacy rights and puts law-abiding citizens at risk, not impacting crime prevention. The video also promotes various products and services through affiliate links.

This video discusses news related to gun rights and advocacy groups. It mentions the "Chipman nomination sunk" and "UK Gun Owners get doxxed." A significant portion focuses on "Moms Looking For Action" and their alleged attempts to "take down spooky boi files" with "vague threats about IP." The content suggests an escalation of tactics by advocacy groups beyond traditional Second Amendment concerns, potentially infringing on free speech.