Another Victory! Judge Stops State Doxxing of Gun/Ammo Owners' Info | Plus Big Correction

Published on October 17, 2022
Duration: 9:14

This entry details a significant legal victory where a California judge halted the state's attempt to doxx gun and ammunition owners via Assembly Bill 173. It also includes a crucial correction regarding the ATF's pistol stabilizing brace rule, emphasizing that brace removal alone may not suffice to avoid SBR classification due to the ATF Worksheet 4999. The content highlights the importance of legal advocacy groups like the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) in protecting Second Amendment rights.

Quick Summary

A California judge granted a preliminary injunction against Assembly Bill 173, stopping the state from doxxing gun and ammunition owners. This ruling, in the Barba v Bonta case, cited past data breaches and irreparable harm. A correction was also issued regarding ATF brace rules, clarifying that brace removal alone may not prevent SBR classification due to ATF Worksheet 4999.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction and Doxxing Victory
  2. 00:25Armslist.com Sponsorship
  3. 01:06Correction on ATF Brace Rule Video
  4. 02:41California Doxxing Case: Barba v Bonta
  5. 03:40Assembly Bill 173 and Doxxing
  6. 04:50Preliminary Injunction Granted
  7. 05:53Significance of Injunction and FPC Statement
  8. 07:02Call to Action and YouTube Algorithm

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the outcome of the Barba v Bonta case regarding California's Assembly Bill 173?

A Superior Court Judge in California issued a preliminary injunction against Assembly Bill 173, halting the state's plan to doxx gun and ammunition owners by transferring their information to universities for research.

What is the significance of a preliminary injunction in legal cases like Barba v Bonta?

A preliminary injunction is a court order that temporarily stops a specific action. It's granted when there's a strong likelihood of success in court and proof of irreparable harm, as seen in the California doxxing case.

What correction was made regarding the ATF's pistol stabilizing brace rule?

A previous video incorrectly stated that simply removing a pistol stabilizing brace would avoid SBR classification. The correction clarifies that ATF Worksheet 4999's scorecard system still applies, meaning brace removal alone may not be sufficient.

Why is the doxxing of gun owner information a concern?

Doxxing gun owners' information poses significant risks, including potential harassment, threats, and the erosion of privacy. Past incidents in New York and California highlight the dangers of such data breaches.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Guns & Gadgets 2nd Amendment News

View all →