Videos tagged with Patricia McCloskey

This video discusses the return of firearms to Mark and Patricia McCloskey years after they were confiscated following a controversial incident. The speaker expresses a critical view of the entire situation, from the initial event to the lengthy process of weapon return, highlighting perceived inefficiencies and poor optics. The content touches upon legal proceedings, plea deals, pardons, and the importance of firearms safety and proper handling, suggesting the McCloskeys could benefit from further firearms training.

This video details the ongoing legal battle of Mark and Patricia McCloskey, who are seeking the return of their firearms five years after an incident where they emerged armed during a protest. Despite receiving a pardon for misdemeanor charges of unlawful use of a weapon, their firearms remain forfeited due to the initial guilty plea. The case highlights complex legal interpretations of pardons versus expungements and their impact on property rights, with ongoing court proceedings determining the final outcome.

This video discusses the legal situation of Mark and Patricia McCloskey, focusing on a federal judge's ruling regarding the return of their firearms. Despite a gubernatorial pardon, the judge denied their request to reclaim their Colt AR-15 and a .380 ACP pistol, stating that the plea agreement's terms remain binding and that guilt, though pardoned, persists. The speaker questions whether the McCloskeys were unfairly treated for exercising their right to self-defense.

The McCloskeys, known for their armed defense during a protest, have been placed on probation by the Missouri Supreme Court regarding their law licenses. This action follows their guilty pleas to misdemeanor charges and subsequent pardon by the governor. The disciplinary counsel argued that the pardon does not negate their guilt, impacting their ability to practice law and potentially their political aspirations.

Mark McCloskey pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of assault for his role in defending his property with firearms during a protest. While the felony charges and gun charges were dropped, McCloskey expressed frustration with the plea, stating the firearms were used to deter an imminent threat. The incident highlights the legal complexities of self-defense and the potential political ramifications of such events, especially with McCloskey's subsequent Senate run.

This video provides an update on two major legal cases impacting Second Amendment rights. It details the defamation lawsuit filed by Kyle Rittenhouse's attorney against Joe Biden for labeling Rittenhouse a white supremacist. Additionally, it discusses the legal situation of Mark and Patricia McCloskey in St. Louis, who are facing charges after defending their property with firearms during a protest, while the protesters themselves have not been charged.

This video from Guns & Gadgets discusses HR7716, the American Family and Private Property Defense Act, which aims to establish a national Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground law. The presenter, Jared, an experienced voice in Second Amendment news, explains how the bill, introduced by Congressmen Jason Smith and Sam Graves, seeks to protect individuals from prosecution when using force to defend themselves, others, or property. The discussion is framed by the controversial case of Mark and Patricia McCloskey in St. Louis and the actions of Circuit Attorney Kim Lee Gardner.

This "Into the Fray" episode discusses the legal ramifications faced by St. Louis homeowners Mark and Patricia McCloskey after they defended their property with firearms during a protest. The couple, armed with an AR-15 and a pistol, confronted protesters who allegedly broke through a gate. The video emphasizes that any use of a firearm for self-defense, even if justified, will lead to intense scrutiny of actions such as trigger discipline, muzzle control, and tactical positioning. It highlights the need for a plan to deal with authorities and legal consequences after such an incident, promoting the USCCA as a resource for legally armed citizens.

This video discusses the legal and political implications of the McCloskey incident, where Mark and Patricia McCloskey were seen defending their home with firearms. The content focuses on how this event has escalated into a political battle concerning Second Amendment rights. Links to amicus briefs filed by the Missouri Attorney General and the Circuit Attorney are provided, along with affiliate links for firearms-related gear and support channels for 'Guns & Gadgets'. The description also includes standard disclaimers about safety, legality, and the informational nature of the content.

This video from Guns & Gadgets discusses the legal and political ramifications of the Mark and Patricia McCloskey incident in St. Louis. It highlights Senator Josh Hawley's letter to Attorney General William P. Barr, urging a federal civil rights investigation into St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner's actions against the McCloskeys. The content emphasizes the right to self-defense and the potential for politically motivated prosecutions.

This video provides an expert legal analysis from Colion Noir regarding the incident where Mark and Patricia McCloskey brandished firearms at protesters in St. Louis. Noir breaks down Missouri trespass laws, the legal distinctions between open carry and assault, and the importance of firearm safety and training when defending one's home. The analysis emphasizes that while open carry is legal in Missouri, pointing a firearm requires immediate threat justification.