Videos tagged with Prohibited Persons

This video breaks down the critical Supreme Court case, US v. Hamani, which will determine the scope of 'the people' under the Second Amendment. It examines 18 USC Section 922G3, a federal law prohibiting firearm possession by unlawful drug users. The Fifth Circuit's ruling, which requires present dangerousness to disarm individuals, is being challenged by the DOJ, who argue for status-based disarmament. The outcome will significantly impact prohibited persons laws nationwide and clarify the application of Bruen and Rahimi precedents.

Gun Owners of America has successfully lobbied to end a 30-year veteran gun ban. This ban unlawfully disarmed over 270,000 veterans by labeling those in the VA fiduciary program as 'prohibited persons' without due process. Effective immediately, the VA will cease reporting these individuals to the NICS system and is working to expunge past records.

This video discusses a significant victory for veterans' Second Amendment rights, spearheaded by Gun Owners of America (GOA). A new law enacted in 2024 prevents the VA from automatically referring individuals in the VA fiduciary program to the FBI's NICS system as prohibited persons. GOA has successfully advocated for the removal of over 270,000 veterans from this list, correcting a long-standing injustice.

This video analyzes California's proposed AB 383 gun law, set to take effect in 2026. The law aims to enhance the state's ability to target individuals prohibited from firearm ownership by refining search warrant justifications and establishing clearer procedures for gun relinquishment. The California Rifle and Pistol Association (CRPA) expresses significant concerns, viewing the law as a potential 'state-mandated local program' that could impose considerable costs and duties on under-resourced law enforcement agencies without adequate guidance from the Department of Justice.

This video critically analyzes a report from Everytown for Gun Safety, alleging it unfairly blames licensed gun dealers for gun trafficking. The host, demonstrating high authority in Second Amendment news, argues the report uses flawed statistics and overlooks criminal activity by prohibited persons. It highlights a perceived 'revolving door' between government officials and anti-gun advocacy groups and promotes CMMG firearms and Tri-Star apparel.

This video discusses the US Supreme Court case *US v. Harris*, which challenges federal law 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(3), prohibiting marijuana users from owning firearms. CRPA President Chuck Michel breaks down the case, its distinction from *US v. Hemani*, and its potential impact on how the government defines "prohibited persons." The discussion touches upon the historical context of gun ownership, legal buyers, the 4473 form, and broader Second Amendment litigation, including *Duncan v. Bonta*. The video also highlights CRPA's advocacy for both law enforcement and cannabis user rights, and the Supreme Court's process for reviewing cases.

This video provides a crucial update for gun owners regarding the Supreme Court's upcoming review of several significant Second Amendment cases. It details cases concerning young adult gun rights (18-20), bans on large-capacity magazines, and the definition of prohibited persons. The analysis aims to inform viewers about the potential impact of these rulings on gun rights across the nation and offers actionable steps for engagement. The description also promotes various sponsor products, merchandise, and organizations that support Second Amendment advocacy.

This video features Mark Smith, a Constitutional attorney and 'Top Voice of 2A', discussing President Trump's reaffirmed support for the Second Amendment, specifically nationwide concealed carry. The discussion clarifies the term 'illegal guns' as referring to firearms possessed by prohibited persons under federal law, not all firearms. It highlights Trump's consistent pro-gun stance and the importance of credible advocacy within the Second Amendment community.

This video discusses the implications of failing a background check for a firearm purchase, highlighting potential consequences such as being denied employment and facing a $500 fine. The title suggests a revelation or 'mask slipping' regarding these regulations. The video aims to inform viewers about the severity of such prohibitions and their broader impact.

This video discusses the potential restoration of Second Amendment rights to certain "prohibited persons" following actions by Donald Trump. It focuses on the legal and political aspects of this issue and its implications for gun ownership and the rights of individuals previously restricted from possessing firearms.

This video discusses a new Department of Justice (DOJ) rule that allows individuals previously prohibited from owning firearms to apply for the restoration of their gun rights. The content focuses on the legal and policy changes impacting firearm ownership for a specific group of people.

This video discusses a significant legal ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit concerning federal gun laws and prohibited persons. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith of Four Boxes Diner analyzes the decision, which states that individuals who use drugs cannot be prohibited from owning firearms. The video covers the background of the case, the court's findings, and its reasoning on the dangerousness of drug users in relation to the Second Amendment. The content focuses on legal analysis and Second Amendment rights.