Videos tagged with Rifle Ban

This video analyzes a critical legal challenge to New Jersey's bans on certain rifles, including the AR-15, and magazines holding more than 10 rounds. It highlights the Trump DOJ's amicus brief arguing these bans violate the Second Amendment, particularly under the 'common use' test established by Supreme Court precedent like Bruin v. DC. The case is now before the Third Circuit on an en banc panel, with significant implications for firearm rights.

The Supreme Court denied review for cases challenging assault weapon and magazine bans, specifically Snoke v. Brown and Ocean State Tactical. This decision, with a 3-3 split among conservative justices, means lower court rulings on these bans stand for now. Justice Thomas dissented, arguing the court is treating the Second Amendment as a "second-class right," while Justice Kavanaugh's statement suggested the issue of AR-15s in common use may be addressed in future cases.

This video provides an expert-level analysis of a critical Supreme Court decision impacting firearm bans nationwide. The discussion details how the Supreme Court granted, vacated, and remanded a magazine ban case, only for a lower court to defy this by upholding the ban while striking down a rifle ban aspect. The speaker, demonstrating deep legal expertise, explains the subsequent appeal to the Third Circuit and the arguments presented, suggesting these bans are likely doomed.

This video details the legal challenges to New Jersey's bans on AR-15 style rifles and standard-capacity magazines. An expert analysis explains how a District Court ruling, despite acknowledging the unconstitutionality of the AR-15 ban, upheld the magazine ban, defying Supreme Court precedent from the Bruen decision. The case is now on appeal to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, with significant implications for Second Amendment rights.

This video discusses recent Supreme Court actions and inactions regarding gun control legislation, focusing on Illinois's rifle and magazine bans. It highlights the repeated relisting of key cases, the implications of the Rahimi decision, and the ongoing legal battles over Second Amendment rights. The content also touches upon enforcement challenges in Illinois, particularly concerning revoked FOID card holders.

This video provides an expert analysis of recent Supreme Court activity concerning Second Amendment rights, focusing on challenges to rifle and magazine bans. It details key cases like Harrel v. Raoul and United States v. Rahimi, explaining how the Supreme Court's decisions in these cases could significantly impact gun control laws nationwide. The speaker, identified as an experienced instructor, highlights the potential for the Court to strike down state-level restrictions on commonly owned semi-automatic firearms and standard-capacity magazines, referencing previous landmark rulings like Heller and Bruen.

The GO SAFE Act (Gas Operated Semi-Automatic Firearms Exclusion Act), introduced as HR 8600 in the House, proposes a national ban on future sales, manufacture, and possession of gas-operated semi-automatic rifles and magazines holding more than 10 rounds. While grandfathering existing firearms and magazines, the bill includes marking requirements for post-enactment items and carries penalties of up to $5,000 fine and 12 months imprisonment per offense. The bill's proponents aim to restrict commonly owned firearms, while opponents view it as an infringement on Second Amendment rights.

This video discusses the legal challenges to Maryland's assault weapon ban, specifically the case Bian v. Brown, which is now before the Supreme Court. The Second Amendment Foundation has filed for a writ of certiorari before judgment, seeking immediate Supreme Court review. Maryland's response argues that the Bruin decision does not invalidate their ban and that the issue is premature for Supreme Court intervention, citing Heller's dicta on M16-style rifles.

This video provides an expert-level analysis of recent Supreme Court decisions regarding assault weapon and magazine bans, particularly focusing on Illinois' Protect Illinois Communities Act (PICA). The speaker, demonstrating significant legal and firearms expertise, breaks down the implications of the Supreme Court denying emergency injunctions and discusses how lower courts, like Judge McGlynn's, are now tasked with evaluating these bans based on Second Amendment principles established in Heller and Bruen. The discussion highlights the strategic legal battles and the importance of specific legal tests in determining the constitutionality of firearm regulations.

This video details the legal battle surrounding assault weapon bans, specifically focusing on the Bianchi v. Frosh case originating in Maryland. It explains how the case has reached the Supreme Court, potentially impacting rifle bans nationwide. The discussion highlights the shift in legal review standards post-Bruen, emphasizing 'text as informed by relevant history and tradition' over previous scrutiny tests.

This video analyzes the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit's oral arguments in the Miller v. Bonta case, which challenges California's ban on "assault weapons" (semi-automatic rifles). Mark W. Smith, a constitutional attorney, breaks down the arguments, focusing on judicial questions regarding "dangerous features" and "common use." The discussion also touches upon potential errors in California's law and quotes relevant legal precedents. The content is presented by the "Four Boxes Diner," which focuses on Second Amendment news and analysis.

This video discusses a significant Supreme Court decision that reportedly blocks all rifle and ammunition bans. The content promises to inform viewers about firearms, potentially covering a range of popular models and calibers, including Glocks, Berettas, 9mm, AK47, Glock 19, Glock 17, Ruger, pistols, magazines, .45 caliber, Sig Sauer, .40 caliber, Colt, and rifles. The channel "Best Guns" aims to provide information on various firearms and handguns.