Videos tagged with Snope

The Supreme Court denied certiorari in two key cases, Snope and Ocean State, concerning firearms bans. Justice Kavanaugh's denial statement argued that AR-15s are in common use for lawful purposes and thus protected by the Second Amendment, suggesting lower courts erred. Justice Thomas's dissent strongly criticized the denial, asserting that the Second Amendment would become a 'second-class right' if such cases are not heard, and that AR-15s clearly fall under the 'arms' protected by the amendment.

This video from CRPA TV features an expert analysis by an attorney from Michel & Associates regarding a historic amicus brief filed by the DOJ in support of the Second Amendment in the Wolford v. Lopez case. The brief challenges Hawaii's 'vampire rule,' which bans firearm carry on private property unless explicitly permitted by the owner, arguing it violates the Second Amendment by not aligning with historical traditions. The expert highlights the legal significance of the DOJ's rare involvement and its potential impact on future Second Amendment litigation nationwide, including cases concerning assault weapon bans and 'sensitive place' restrictions.

The Washington State Supreme Court upheld a law banning the sale and distribution of magazines holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition. The court ruled these 'large capacity magazines' are not protected by the Second Amendment or the Washington State Constitution, deeming them not 'arms' essential for self-defense. This decision sets a precedent that could impact future gun rights interpretations and regulations on firearm accessories.

This video discusses recent developments in Second Amendment cases before the Supreme Court. While "Snope" and "Ocean State" cases were reconferenced, "Worth v. Jacobson" resulted in a win as the Supreme Court denied certiorari, allowing the Eighth Circuit's ruling that 18-20 year olds have the right to carry to stand. The "Duncan" decision regarding California's MAG ban is also highlighted as a potential factor influencing future Supreme Court decisions.