9th Circuit Throws Out California's Ban on Free Speech

Published on September 14, 2023
Duration: 16:55

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has reversed a lower court's denial of a preliminary injunction against California's AB 2571, a law restricting firearm-related advertising attractive to minors. The court found the law likely unconstitutional under the First Amendment, stating California failed to meet the burden of showing it significantly furthers its interest in curtailing unlawful firearm use without unduly infringing on protected speech. The case is remanded for further proceedings, with the expectation of an injunction being issued.

Quick Summary

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that California's AB 2571, a law restricting firearm advertising attractive to minors, is likely unconstitutional under the First Amendment. The court found the law overly broad and lacking sufficient evidence to justify its infringement on commercial speech, reversing a lower court's denial of a preliminary injunction.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction and Good News
  2. 00:17Junior Sport Magazine v. Bonta Case Overview
  3. 01:16Background of AB 2571
  4. 02:31Corrections to AB 2571 and Remaining Issues
  5. 03:21Federal District Court Denial and Appeal
  6. 04:23Ninth Circuit Oral Arguments and Decision
  7. 05:15Key Excerpts from the Ninth Circuit Decision
  8. 06:30Interpreting the Ninth Circuit's Ruling
  9. 07:08Reversal and Remand Explained
  10. 08:55Why the Ninth Circuit Remanded the Case
  11. 09:27Anticipating the Injunction
  12. 10:07Likely Unconstitutional Ruling and Wins
  13. 10:48Viewpoint Discrimination Discussion
  14. 11:35Intermediate Scrutiny and State's Burden
  15. 12:20Lack of Evidence for State's Claims
  16. 13:06Legislature's Disregard for Constitutional Warnings
  17. 13:35Intent to Bankrupt Gun Culture
  18. 14:21Timeline and Next Steps
  19. 15:15Current Status: No Injunction Yet
  20. 15:33Advice for Businesses and Community
  21. 16:24Concluding Remarks and Call to Action

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the Ninth Circuit's ruling on California's AB 2571?

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court's decision, finding California's AB 2571, which restricted firearm advertising attractive to minors, likely unconstitutional under the First Amendment. The case was remanded for further proceedings, with an injunction expected.

Why is AB 2571 considered likely unconstitutional?

The Ninth Circuit determined that AB 2571 was overly broad, infringing on both adult and minor speech, and that California failed to provide sufficient evidence to justify the restriction on lawful commercial speech. The state did not meet the burden of proving the law significantly furthered its interest in preventing youth firearm violence.

What is the current status of AB 2571?

While the Ninth Circuit has ruled the law is likely unconstitutional and remanded the case, a formal preliminary injunction has not yet been issued by the federal district court. Therefore, businesses should continue to operate cautiously as if the law were still in effect until further notice.

What does 'intermediate scrutiny' mean in the context of AB 2571?

Intermediate scrutiny is the legal standard applied by the Ninth Circuit, requiring the state to demonstrate a substantial government interest and that the regulation is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. This is a higher standard than rational basis review and was not met by California in this case.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from CRPA TV

View all →