Ammo Freedom Week IS OVER! 9th Circuit Hates Freedom!

Published on February 6, 2024
Duration: 3:52

The "Ammo Freedom Week" in California has been halted by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which granted a stay pending appeal in the case of Roie v. Bon. This decision reverses a previous district court ruling that had issued a permanent injunction against certain ammunition restrictions. Judge Callahan dissented, arguing the appellant (Attorney General) had not met the burden of showing likelihood of success or irreparable injury.

Quick Summary

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ended California's "Ammo Freedom Week" by granting a stay pending appeal in the case of Roie v. Bon. This decision reverses a district court's permanent injunction, meaning the temporary period of increased ammunition sales is now over while the case is further reviewed.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Ammo Freedom Week Ends in California
  2. 00:07Ninth Circuit Halts Ammunition Sales
  3. 00:18Case: Roie v. Bon Explained
  4. 00:22Judges Callahan, Clifton, and Thomas
  5. 00:33Motion to Stay District Court Injunction
  6. 00:47Judge Callahan's Dissenting Opinion
  7. 01:03Irreparable Injury Argument
  8. 01:22Ninth Circuit's Judicial Behavior
  9. 01:41Supreme Court's Watch on Ninth Circuit
  10. 02:09Heads Up for Ammunition Companies
  11. 02:30Freedom Week for Ammunition is Over
  12. 02:35Judge Roger T. Bonz's Decision
  13. 02:48Stay Informed on 2nd Amendment News

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened to California's Ammo Freedom Week?

California's "Ammo Freedom Week" has been halted. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals granted a stay pending appeal in the case of Roie v. Bon, effectively reversing a district court's permanent injunction that had allowed for increased ammunition sales.

What was the Ninth Circuit's decision in Roie v. Bon regarding ammunition?

The Ninth Circuit granted a motion to stay a district court's permanent injunction in Roie v. Bon. This means the previous ruling allowing for broader ammunition access in California is temporarily suspended while the appeal proceeds.

Why did Judge Callahan dissent in the Roie v. Bon stay decision?

Judge Callahan dissented because he believed the appellant (the Attorney General) had not met the burden of proving a likelihood of success on the merits of the appeal. He also argued that people having ammunition does not constitute irreparable injury.

What is the significance of the Ninth Circuit's ruling on ammunition sales in California?

The ruling signifies the end of the "Ammo Freedom Week" in California. It indicates that legal challenges to ammunition restrictions are complex and subject to appellate review, with the Ninth Circuit's decision temporarily reinstating previous limitations.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Guns & Gadgets 2nd Amendment News

View all →