AR15 vs M16 from a gun rights perspective
John Hickok argues that from a gun rights perspective, the distinction between the AR-15 and the M16 is politically detrimental. He explains that the primary difference is select-fire capability (full-auto or burst on the M16), but contends this difference is negligible in terms of effectiveness and public safety concerns. Hickok believes focusing on this distinction inadvertently frames the M16 as dangerous and the AR-15 as less so, which he sees as a flawed and dangerous argument that can be exploited by anti-gun advocates.












