ATF Charges American FRT Trigger Owner For Illegal Possession Of A Machine Gun 🤨

Published on August 7, 2022
Duration: 4:54

This video discusses the arrest of an individual in Massachusetts for alleged illegal possession of machine guns, specifically citing Rare Breed and Tommy Triggers forced reset triggers (FRTs). The ATF's classification of these FRTs as machine guns is a key point of contention, with ongoing litigation challenging this definition. The case highlights potential legal ramifications for owners of FRTs, particularly those lacking serial numbers, and underscores the evolving landscape of firearm regulations.

Quick Summary

The ATF has begun charging individuals for illegal possession of machine guns based on their classification of Forced Reset Triggers (FRTs). This stance is currently under legal challenge, as owners argue FRTs do not meet the definition of a machine gun. Possession of un-serialized FRTs can also lead to separate charges.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Headline: Man Arrested, Machine Guns Seized
  2. 00:13Repercussions for FRT Owners
  3. 00:34Massachusetts Gun Laws & FRT Confiscation
  4. 01:10Charges and DOJ Website Reference
  5. 01:38First US FRT Charge & Lawsuits
  6. 02:09FRT Operation vs. Machine Gun Definition
  7. 02:31ATF Declares FRTs as Machine Guns
  8. 03:06FRTs Lacking Serial Numbers

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main legal issue surrounding Forced Reset Triggers (FRTs)?

The primary legal issue is the ATF's classification of certain FRTs, like those from Rare Breed and Tommy Triggers, as machine guns. This classification is being challenged in court, as owners argue they do not meet the legal definition of a machine gun.

Can owning an FRT trigger lead to machine gun charges?

Yes, as demonstrated by a case in Massachusetts, the ATF can charge individuals with illegal possession of machine guns if they possess FRTs that the ATF has classified as such. This is a developing legal area with ongoing litigation.

Why are FRTs without serial numbers a legal concern?

Firearms and their key components, including triggers classified as machine guns, are typically required to have serial numbers for registration and tracking. FRTs lacking serial numbers can lead to additional charges for possessing un-serialized items.

What is the significance of the ongoing lawsuits regarding FRTs?

The lawsuits aim to challenge the ATF's determination that FRTs are machine guns. If successful, these lawsuits could prevent the ATF from enforcing machine gun regulations on these devices and protect current owners.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Mrgunsngear Channel

View all →