Biden Admin CITING historical religious persecution and racism to JUSTIFY Gun Control... SERIOUSLY

Published on August 10, 2022
Duration: 6:52

This video critically examines the Biden administration's justification for gun control measures, specifically the ban on gun possession by medical marijuana users. The Department of Justice (DOJ) is cited as arguing that historical instances of religious persecution and racial discrimination, such as disarming Catholics and Native Americans, provide a precedent for current firearm restrictions. This legal strategy is presented as a response to the Supreme Court's Bruen decision, which requires gun laws to be consistent with the nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation. The discussion highlights the legal challenge brought by Nikki Fried, who argues that prohibiting cannabis consumers from owning guns violates the Second Amendment, and contrasts this with the federal government's allowance of gun ownership for users of other psychoactive prescription drugs.

Quick Summary

The Biden administration's DOJ is citing historical religious persecution and racial discrimination, such as disarming Catholics and Native Americans, to justify current gun control measures, particularly the ban on medical marijuana users. This legal strategy is a response to the Supreme Court's Bruen decision, which requires gun laws to align with the nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation.

Chapters

  1. 00:07DOJ Restrictions on Gun Owners
  2. 00:46XS Sights Sponsor Mention
  3. 01:42Biden Admin Defends Gun Ban for Marijuana Users
  4. 02:14Administration Urges Lawsuit Dismissal
  5. 02:34Nikki Fried's Lawsuit Against Gun Ban
  6. 03:25Legal Drugs vs. Firearms Ownership
  7. 04:09Bruen Case Ruling Explained
  8. 04:31Gun Control Based on Historical Racism
  9. 05:25Nikki Fried Opposes Ron DeSantis on Rights
  10. 05:51Recap of Legal Arguments

Frequently Asked Questions

What historical justifications is the Biden administration using for gun control?

The Biden administration's DOJ is citing historical instances of religious persecution and racial discrimination, such as disarming Catholics and Native Americans centuries ago, as a basis for current firearm restrictions, particularly for medical marijuana users.

How does the Bruen decision impact gun control laws?

The Supreme Court's Bruen decision requires that gun restrictions must be consistent with the nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation. This places the burden on the government to prove that current laws are analogous to long-standing policies that align with the right to bear arms.

Why is Nikki Fried suing the Biden administration over gun control?

Nikki Fried, a Florida agricultural commissioner, is suing the Biden administration because she argues that prohibiting all cannabis consumers from owning guns violates the Second Amendment. She contends this ban is inconsistent with policies allowing gun ownership for users of other legal psychoactive drugs.

What is the DOJ's argument regarding marijuana and gun ownership?

The Justice Department argues that the ban on gun possession by medical marijuana users is rational and consistent with the right to bear arms, asserting that marijuana use impairs the ability to handle guns responsibly. This prohibition applies regardless of whether the user handles guns while impaired.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Langley Outdoors Academy

View all →