BREAKING! Emergency Restraining Order Issued Against New Mexico Governor's Carry Ban!

New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham issued an emergency public health order banning concealed and open carry of firearms in Bernalillo County for 30 days, citing gun violence. This order, which applies even to those with legal permits, is being challenged legally by gun rights organizations, arguing it exceeds the governor's authority and violates Second Amendment rights established in Heller and Bruin decisions. The order also faces internal opposition from some law enforcement officials who fear personal liability under New Mexico's Civil Rights Act.

This video provides an expert analysis by Colion Noir on New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham's extensive gun control legislative package for 2024. Noir critically examines proposed bans on 'assault weapons,' extended waiting periods, and age restrictions, arguing they are ineffective and politically motivated. He highlights the influence of anti-gun advocacy groups and contrasts the proposed measures with what he considers more effective solutions for public safety.

This video details the legal and political fallout from New Mexico Governor Michelle Grisham's emergency order banning the open and concealed carry of firearms in Bernalillo County and Albuquerque. It covers the temporary halt of the order by Judge David Herrera Uvas, citing Second Amendment violations, and the subsequent legal challenges and political responses, including an impeachment petition against the governor. The Attorney General's refusal to defend the order and various organizations' lawsuits are also highlighted.

This video discusses New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham's controversial 'emergency' public health proclamation that initially banned lawful concealed carry in Albuquerque and Bernalillo County. It details the legal challenges, including a federal judge's ruling on public parks and playgrounds, and the governor's subsequent extension of the order making playgrounds gun-free zones. The content also touches on proposed legislation for longer sentences for felons in possession of firearms and the ongoing legal battles against the governor's edicts.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled California's ban on open carry in most urban and public places unconstitutional, citing the Bruin decision. This ruling is significant as it affirms that the ban does not align with historical gun rights and practices in the U.S. The decision highlights the importance of open carry as a crime deterrent and a means to normalize firearm ownership among law-abiding citizens, challenging negative stereotypes.

This video discusses New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham's attempts to ban open and concealed carry, even after a restraining order was issued against her initial order. The governor has since amended the order to ban carry in public parks and playgrounds, citing them as high-risk areas. The video analyzes the legal challenges to these orders in light of the Supreme Court's Bruin decision.

This video provides an expert analysis of the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari in Torcivia v. Suffolk County. The speaker, an authority on Second Amendment litigation, explains how the Second Circuit's ruling allows for warrantless firearm seizures under the 'special needs exception,' despite the Supreme Court's prior decision in Caniglia v. Strom. The denial means this precedent stands, potentially impacting future firearm rights cases.

This video provides an expert analysis of the Supreme Court's 5-4 emergency order concerning Texas's border dispute with the Biden administration. The speaker, an expert in legal matters, breaks down the implications for Texas's self-defense claims under the US Constitution and the ongoing legal battles involving border security measures like concertina wire. The analysis covers the 5th Circuit's role, the emergency application process, and the potential dismissal of the case.

This video provides an expert analysis of the Supreme Court's 8-1 decision denying a stay for Missouri's Second Amendment Preservation Act (SAPA). The speaker, an expert in legal analysis, details how SAPA attempts to shield state agents from enforcing federal gun laws, its comparison to Texas's SB8 abortion law enforcement mechanism, and the implications of the Supreme Court's ruling, particularly concerning the 11th Amendment and Section 1983 lawsuits.

This video discusses the Supreme Court's unanimous 9-0 decision in a case involving the Martins, who were victims of an FBI wrong-house raid. The core issue revolves around the discretionary function exception under the Federal Tort Claims Act, which the government uses to claim immunity. The Supreme Court's ruling clarified that simply exercising judgment does not automatically grant immunity, and the government must demonstrate that decisions were grounded in actual policy considerations, not mere mistakes. The 11th Circuit is now rehearing arguments in light of this precedent, with judges appearing skeptical of the government's broad claims of immunity for operational failures.