BREAKING NEWS: Federal Prohibition on 2A Rights For Domestic Restraining Orders is UNCONSTITUTIONAL

Published on February 3, 2023
Duration: 14:46

An appellate court ruling from the 5th Circuit has declared federal law 18 USC 922(g)(8), which prohibits firearm possession by individuals subject to domestic violence restraining orders, unconstitutional. The court, citing the Supreme Court's Bruen decision, found that the government failed to demonstrate historical precedent for such a broad restriction on Second Amendment rights. This ruling vacates convictions under this statute, emphasizing that the right to bear arms is presumed unless the government can prove the individual is not law-abiding and that the restriction aligns with historical tradition.

Quick Summary

The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled federal law 18 USC 922(g)(8), which bans firearm possession for individuals under domestic violence restraining orders, as unconstitutional. Citing the Bruen decision, the court stated the government failed to show historical precedent for such a broad restriction, restoring Second Amendment rights in these cases.

Chapters

  1. 00:04Appellate Court Decision News
  2. 00:20FoldAR Sponsor Acknowledgment
  3. 01:125th Circuit Court 2nd Amendment Ruling
  4. 01:45Rahimi Lawsuit Details
  5. 02:09Rahimi's Criminal Activity Summary
  6. 03:23Key Aspects of Firearms Case
  7. 05:08Case Details Against Rahimi
  8. 06:03Bruen Decision Applicability
  9. 08:12Government Rationale for Second Amendment Restraint
  10. 09:462A Rights Restored
  11. 11:17Concluding Statement

Frequently Asked Questions

What federal law was deemed unconstitutional by the 5th Circuit Court regarding firearm rights?

The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that federal law 18 USC 922(g)(8) is unconstitutional. This law prohibited individuals subject to domestic violence restraining orders from possessing firearms.

What legal precedent did the 5th Circuit Court use to strike down the federal gun ban for restraining orders?

The court relied heavily on the Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen. This precedent requires firearm regulations to be consistent with the nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation.

What does the 5th Circuit ruling mean for individuals under domestic restraining orders and their Second Amendment rights?

The ruling means that the blanket prohibition on firearm possession for those under a domestic restraining order is no longer constitutionally sound under federal law. The government must now prove an individual is not 'law-abiding' and that the restriction aligns with historical tradition.

What was the outcome of the United States of America v. Zackey Rahimi case?

In the case of United States of America v. Zackey Rahimi, the 5th Circuit Court vacated Rahimi's conviction under 18 USC 922(g)(8), finding the statute itself unconstitutional. This decision impacts all similar federal prosecutions.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Guns & Gadgets 2nd Amendment News

View all →