BREAKING: Stormy Daniels Teaches NY Guv Kathy Hochul 2A Lesson...

Published on May 16, 2024
Duration: 16:54

This video analyzes New York's ban on body armor, enacted after the Buffalo Tops supermarket shooting. It questions the constitutionality of the ban, particularly in light of Stormy Daniels reportedly wearing body armor during the Trump trial, despite not being in an 'eligible profession' as defined by the law. The speaker argues that the Second Amendment, as interpreted in Heller v. DC, likely protects the right to wear body armor.

Quick Summary

New York's law restricts body armor for civilians not in eligible professions, defining it as any protective covering against gunfire. However, the video argues this ban may violate the Second Amendment, as historical definitions of 'arms' include defensive armor, making restrictions an infringement.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Intro: NY Body Armor Ban & Stormy Daniels
  2. 00:18Stormy Daniels' Body Armor Use
  3. 01:19Context: Trump Trial & NY Laws
  4. 02:17Buffalo Shooting & Hochul's Response
  5. 04:53Summary of NY Body Armor Statute
  6. 06:02Statute Details: Unlawful Purchase
  7. 07:41Contradiction: Daniels vs. NY Law
  8. 08:47Comparison: Jean Carroll Case
  9. 10:34Statute: Unlawful Sale of Body Armor
  10. 11:47Constitutional Argument: Heller & 'Arms'
  11. 13:11Heller: Dictionary Definitions of 'Arms'
  12. 14:12Heller: Definition of 'Infringe'
  13. 15:07Burden of Proof on Government
  14. 15:56Conclusion: 2A Rights & NY Law

Frequently Asked Questions

What is New York's law regarding body armor?

New York has enacted laws restricting the purchase, sale, and possession of body armor for individuals not employed in eligible professions, such as law enforcement. The law defines body armor as any protective covering intended to stop gunfire.

Why was Stormy Daniels reportedly wearing body armor in New York?

According to her attorney, Stormy Daniels wore body armor while in New York for court appearances due to fears for her safety, including potential assassination attempts or harm from individuals she described as 'crazies' or 'nuts'.

Is New York's ban on body armor constitutional?

The video argues that New York's body armor ban may be unconstitutional. Citing Heller v. DC, it suggests that 'arms' under the Second Amendment, as historically defined, includes defensive armor, and restricting its use would be an infringement.

What does the Second Amendment mean by 'arms'?

Based on historical dictionaries cited in Heller v. DC, 'arms' in the Second Amendment context includes 'weapons of offense or armor of defense' and 'anything that a man wears for his defense.' This broad definition is used to argue for the right to possess body armor.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from The Four Boxes Diner

View all →