EPA Denies Anti-Hunting Group's Latest Petition to Ban Traditional Ammunition

Published on April 12, 2012
Duration: 10:25

The EPA has denied a petition from the Center for Biological Diversity seeking to ban traditional ammunition, citing a lack of jurisdiction under the Toxic Substances Control Act. This marks the second denial for similar petitions, with the EPA stating the latest filing was essentially identical to a previous one. Legislation, specifically HR 4089, the Sportsman's Heritage Act of 2012, is being advanced to further clarify that the EPA cannot regulate ammunition components.

Quick Summary

The EPA has denied a petition to ban traditional ammunition, citing a lack of jurisdiction under the Toxic Substances Control Act. This decision upholds the status quo for ammunition used by hunters, law enforcement, and recreational shooters, while legislative efforts like HR 4089 aim to further protect these products.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction and EPA Petition Denial
  2. 00:33EPA's Reasoning for Denial
  3. 01:54Legal Challenges and Court Dismissals
  4. 03:15Legislative Efforts: HR 4089
  5. 05:34Economic Impact of Ammunition Ban
  6. 06:31Ammunition Market Breakdown
  7. 07:21Usage of Ammunition Beyond Hunting
  8. 08:13Factors Affecting Ammunition Prices
  9. 09:22Conservation Funding and Ammunition Sales
  10. 10:05Conclusion and Call to Action

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the EPA's decision regarding the petition to ban traditional ammunition?

The EPA denied a petition from the Center for Biological Diversity seeking to ban traditional ammunition, stating it does not have jurisdiction under the Toxic Substances Control Act to do so. This was a repeat denial of a similar petition.

What is HR 4089 and its significance for ammunition?

HR 4089, the Sportsman's Heritage Act of 2012, is legislation supported by various hunting and sportsmen's groups. It aims to clarify that the Toxic Substances Control Act's exemption for ammunition and firearms extends to their components, preventing regulatory bans on traditional ammunition.

What are the potential economic consequences of banning traditional ammunition?

Banning traditional ammunition could lead to an average 190% price increase. This would affect not only hunters but also law enforcement, military, and civilian recreational shooters, and could significantly reduce excise tax revenue for conservation efforts.

What percentage of ammunition sold in the U.S. is traditional ammunition?

Approximately 95% of ammunition sold in the United States is traditional ammunition. Only 5% is considered alternative ammunition, with the vast majority of that being shot shell for waterfowl hunting.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from NRA

View all →