Former ATF Agent Testifies AR Receivers Don't Meet Legal Definition
This video features former ATF agent Dan O'Kelly explaining why AR-15 receivers may not meet the legal definition of a firearm under the Gun Control Act of 1968. O'Kelly, with extensive experience, argues the ATF's interpretation is inconsistent and legally questionable, citing a past court case where a judge ruled against the ATF's stance. The discussion also touches on potential future regulatory actions by the Biden administration concerning AR pistols and the NFA.













