FPC Files Lawsuit Against ATF Over Frame/Receiver Rule

Published on August 12, 2022
Duration: 4:02

The Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) has filed a lawsuit against the ATF challenging the new final rule redefining frames and receivers. The lawsuit argues that the rule defies the plain language of the Gun Control Act and expands the ATF's authority beyond congressionally established law, particularly concerning items colloquially known as 'ghost guns' or 80% lowers. This action follows a similar lawsuit filed by GOA, highlighting ongoing legal challenges to the ATF's regulatory actions.

Quick Summary

The Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) has filed a lawsuit against the ATF challenging their new final rule redefining frames and receivers. The FPC argues this rule defies the Gun Control Act and expands agency power beyond congressional authority, citing the West Virginia v. EPA Supreme Court decision.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Sponsor: Gunspot Marketplace
  2. 00:39FPC Lawsuit Against ATF Announced
  3. 00:49Frame and Receiver Redefinition Rule
  4. 01:09Lawsuit Complaint Details
  5. 01:56FPC Attorney Cody Wisniewski's Statement
  6. 02:44Supreme Court Precedent: West Virginia v. EPA
  7. 03:03Broader Legal Challenges
  8. 03:11Support for FPC and GOA

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) suing the ATF over?

The Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) has filed a lawsuit against the ATF challenging their new final rule that redefines frames and receivers. This rule significantly impacts regulations concerning firearm components, including those colloquially known as 'ghost guns' or 80% lowers.

What is the main argument in the FPC's lawsuit against the ATF's frame and receiver rule?

The FPC argues that the ATF's final rule defies the plain language of the Gun Control Act and long-standing agency interpretations. They contend that the ATF is attempting to create a broad, sweeping definition that includes items not yet considered frames or receivers, thereby exceeding congressionally established law.

What legal precedent is being cited in the FPC's lawsuit against the ATF?

The lawsuit references the Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. EPA. This precedent establishes that federal agencies cannot create new regulations or expand their authority unless Congress has explicitly granted them that power through law.

Is the FPC's lawsuit the only legal challenge to the ATF's frame and receiver rule?

No, the FPC's lawsuit is the second major legal challenge against the ATF's frame and receiver rule. Gun Owners of America (GOA) had previously filed a similar lawsuit concerning this regulation.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Guns & Gadgets 2nd Amendment News

View all →