Ginny Simone Reporting | S6 E3: “ATF's Ammo Ban: A Test Case”

Published on March 26, 2015
Duration: 6:52

This video discusses the ATF's proposed ban on M855 ammunition, framing it as a "test case" for broader gun control measures. It highlights concerns that the ban, if enacted, could lead to further restrictions on various rifle calibers. The content emphasizes the legal and practical arguments against the ban, particularly regarding the definition of "armor piercing" ammunition and the historical sporting purpose of M855.

Quick Summary

The ATF's proposed ban on M855 ammunition is viewed by gun owners as a "test case" for broader gun control measures. Critics argue M855 does not meet the legal definition of "armor piercing" due to its partially lead core, despite ATF claims of increased risk to law enforcement. The potential ban has spurred a surge in sales and price increases for this popular ammunition.

Chapters

  1. 00:08ATF Ammo Ban "Test Case"
  2. 00:31Congressional Ammo Ban Push
  3. 00:38Legal Expert on ATF Tactics
  4. 00:56Armor Piercing Claims Debunked
  5. 01:24Solution to Obama's Gun Control Problem
  6. 01:41M855 Ammunition History
  7. 02:02Escalation of Ammo Bans
  8. 02:14President's "Dictator" Actions
  9. 02:30Power Grab Allegations
  10. 02:36M855 Sporting Purpose Status
  11. 02:51Safety Claims vs. Reality
  12. 03:02Police Groups on Ammo Ban Impact
  13. 03:14Criminal Use of M855 Data
  14. 03:35AR-15 Pistol Prompt?
  15. 03:44ATF Concealability Argument
  16. 04:00Reclassifying Green Tip Ammo
  17. 04:12Armor Piercing Definition Criteria
  18. 04:36Ignoring the Law
  19. 04:46Customer Reaction & Sales Uptick
  20. 05:07Price Increase of M855
  21. 05:14Law Enforcement & Military Use
  22. 05:32Industry Disruption Fears
  23. 05:41National Security Implications
  24. 06:00Concern for Federal Overreach
  25. 06:11Protecting Passions from Government
  26. 06:24Monarchy vs. Democracy
  27. 06:30Message to Stand By Guns
  28. 06:39NRA's Fight Strategy

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the ATF's proposed ban on M855 ammunition considered by gun owners?

Gun owners and Second Amendment supporters view the ATF's proposed ban on M855 ammunition as a "test case." They believe that if the ATF and the administration can successfully ban this specific type of ammunition, it will pave the way for them to ban other cartridges as well, escalating gun control measures.

Why does the ATF claim M855 ammunition is a threat?

The ATF claims M855 ammunition poses a threat because it is allegedly "armor piercing" and can increase risks to law enforcement, especially when used in easily concealable weapons like AR-15 pistols. This justification is contested by critics who argue the ammunition does not meet the legal definition of armor piercing.

Does M855 ammunition meet the definition of armor piercing?

Critics argue that M855 ammunition does not meet the legal definition of armor piercing. The ATF's definition requires the projectile's core to be exclusively made of materials other than lead. M855 ammunition has a partially lead core, which, according to its proponents, disqualifies it as armor piercing.

What has been the market reaction to the potential M855 ammunition ban?

The potential ban has led to a significant surge in sales for M855 and other 5.56 rounds. Consumers are rushing to purchase ammunition, driving prices up to nearly a dollar per round, despite the increased cost, as they anticipate the ban will go into effect.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from NRA

View all →