Gun Gripes 99 3/4: Proposed Online Ammunition Sales Ban

Published on May 25, 2015
Duration: 24:21

This video discusses the proposed 'Stop Online Ammunition Sales Act of 2015,' highlighting concerns about its practical implications and potential ineffectiveness. The speakers argue that requiring in-person ID for online ammo purchases and flagging purchases over 1,000 rounds to the ATF would create undue burdens for law-abiding citizens, particularly competitive shooters and handloaders. They emphasize that such regulations often stem from emotional responses rather than logical analysis of crime prevention, suggesting that focusing on gun-free zones and the intent behind actions would be more effective.

Quick Summary

The 'Stop Online Ammunition Sales Act of 2015' proposed requiring in-person ID for online ammo purchases and flagging buys over 1,000 rounds to the ATF. Critics argue this is an ineffective, emotion-driven regulation that burdens law-abiding citizens, particularly competitive shooters and reloaders, without significantly deterring criminals.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Gun Gripes Episode
  2. 00:39Proposed Online Ammunition Sales Regulation
  3. 01:01Representative Bonnie Watson Coleman's Bill
  4. 01:13Bill Requirements: In-Person ID
  5. 01:501,000 Round Threshold & ATF Reporting
  6. 02:16Impact on Competitive Shooters
  7. 02:30Critique of Regulatory 'Horse Crap'
  8. 03:03Arbitrary Thousand Round Number
  9. 03:46Aurora Tragedy & Bill Justification
  10. 04:08Criminals Can Buy Ammo Locally
  11. 04:32Analogy: Buying Steak Knives
  12. 04:55Regulatory Headaches vs. Crime
  13. 05:071,000 Rounds is Not a Lot for Shooters
  14. 05:30Millions of Rounds for Competitive Shooters
  15. 05:49Round Counts vs. Rate of Fire
  16. 06:10Emotion vs. Logic in Lawmaking
  17. 06:39Future Bans: Dealers & Logs
  18. 07:03FOID Cards for Ammo Purchases
  19. 07:14Impact on Handloaders
  20. 07:16Buying 10,000 Primers
  21. 08:04Buying Projectiles Online
  22. 08:302,000 lbs of Lead for Reloading
  23. 09:03Emotional Appeals in Legislation
  24. 09:10The Real Problem: Gun-Free Zones
  25. 10:02Message to Anti-Gun Viewers
  26. 10:24Majority of Armed Citizens Are Good People
  27. 10:42Legal Standpoint: Intent
  28. 11:05Scenario: Buying 5,000 Rounds
  29. 11:28ATF's Current Workload
  30. 12:02Investigating Every Claim
  31. 12:30Proving Intent for Conviction
  32. 12:54Sponsor's Sons Convicted of Robbery
  33. 13:34Call Representatives & Voice Opinions
  34. 14:10Ammunition for Defense & Practice
  35. 14:49Gasoline Analogy
  36. 15:16US Economy & Firearm Sales
  37. 15:35Solely Online Ammunition Sellers
  38. 15:54Logistics of Large Online Operations
  39. 16:36Millionaire Importers & Surplus
  40. 17:05Importer's Risk & Cost
  41. 17:33Stockpiling Ammunition as Investment
  42. 18:22Impact on Surplus Ammunition Market
  43. 18:40Ammunition Shelf Life
  44. 19:08Ammunition Manufacturing for Longevity
  45. 19:24Investing in Ammunition
  46. 19:56Benefits of Ordering Ammo Online
  47. 20:05Local Dealers & Price Increases
  48. 20:54Final Thoughts: Lack of Logic
  49. 21:13Sponsors' Lack of Understanding
  50. 21:32Knee-Jerk Decisions Based on Emotion
  51. 22:00Stay Informed & Contact Representatives
  52. 22:14Media Suppression of Information
  53. 22:34Distraction from Real Issues
  54. 22:45Conclusion: Gun Gripe
  55. 23:22Channel Projects & Quality Improvement
  56. 23:50Full-Time YouTube Production
  57. 24:04More Content in the Pipeline

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the proposed 'Stop Online Ammunition Sales Act of 2015'?

The 'Stop Online Ammunition Sales Act of 2015' was a proposed bill that would require individuals to present photo identification in person when purchasing ammunition online. It also proposed flagging purchases exceeding 1,000 rounds within five days to the ATF, aiming to regulate or ban online ammo sales.

Why is the 1,000-round ammunition purchase limit criticized?

Critics argue the 1,000-round limit is arbitrary and impractical for many lawful gun owners, such as competitive shooters or those who practice frequently. These individuals can easily exceed this quantity in a single shooting session or weekend, and the proposed flagging system could unfairly target them.

How might banning online ammunition sales affect the economy?

Banning online ammunition sales could negatively impact the economy by shutting down companies that operate solely online, leading to job losses. It could also reduce market competition, potentially allowing local dealers to increase prices, making ammunition less accessible and more expensive for consumers.

What is the role of 'intent' in laws related to ammunition purchases?

The speakers emphasize that legal proceedings, especially those involving the ATF, heavily rely on proving 'intent.' They argue that simply purchasing a large quantity of ammunition does not automatically prove malicious intent, and any conviction would require demonstrating that intent, making regulatory hurdles alone insufficient for crime prevention.

What alternative solutions are suggested for preventing gun violence?

Instead of focusing on ammunition sales regulations, the video suggests addressing 'gun-free zones' as a primary issue. The speakers believe that allowing law-abiding citizens to carry firearms in these areas could act as a deterrent to potential attackers, as they would face the risk of immediate confrontation.

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Iraqveteran8888

View all →