Gun Talk Live - Wrenn v DC; Jamey Johnson; Upgrading your Trigger:Gun Talk| FB Live 7.26.17

Published on July 27, 2017
Duration: 11:23

This video discusses a significant legal victory for gun rights advocates, specifically the Second Amendment Foundation's success in obtaining a permanent injunction against Washington D.C.'s 'good cause' requirement for concealed carry permits. Judge Griffith's ruling emphasizes that the right to carry firearms for self-defense extends beyond the home and that the district's provision effectively constitutes a ban for most residents, directly challenging the precedent set by the Heller decision. The segment highlights the ongoing legal battle and potential appeals to higher courts.

Quick Summary

The Second Amendment Foundation successfully obtained a permanent injunction against Washington D.C.'s 'good cause' requirement for concealed carry permits. Judge Griffith ruled that this provision effectively bans the exercise of the constitutional right to self-defense for most DC residents, aligning with the principles of the Heller decision.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Intro and Updates
  2. 00:39Jamey Johnson Incident
  3. 02:12Wrenn v. DC - Gun Rights Victory
  4. 02:56Judge Griffith's Ruling on Good Cause
  5. 03:54Apex Triggers Discussion
  6. 06:17National Shooting Sports Month
  7. 08:32Gun Talk Radio Upcoming Topics
  8. 09:16Gun Dealio App and Training DVDs

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the outcome of the Wrenn v. DC case regarding concealed carry permits?

The Second Amendment Foundation secured a permanent injunction against Washington D.C.'s 'good cause' requirement for concealed carry permits. This ruling found the provision to be an unconstitutional barrier to the right to self-defense.

Why is the 'good cause' requirement for concealed carry permits controversial?

The 'good cause' requirement forces applicants to prove a specific need to carry a firearm, which courts have increasingly viewed as an infringement on the fundamental right to self-defense, effectively acting as a ban for many citizens.

Who ruled on the Wrenn v. DC case, and what was their reasoning?

Judge Griffith of the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled on the case. He stated that the right to carry firearms for self-defense extends beyond the home and that DC's 'good reason' law was a total ban for most residents.

What is the significance of the Wrenn v. DC ruling for gun rights?

The ruling is a significant victory for gun rights, reinforcing the idea that the right to bear arms for self-defense is a fundamental constitutional right that cannot be unduly restricted by subjective 'good cause' requirements.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Gun Talk Media

View all →