Hypocrite Kamala Harris Says AR-15s Were Designed to Kill a Lot of Human Beings Quickly

Published on October 3, 2022
Duration: 5:58

Colion Noir, an expert in firearms and the Second Amendment, critically analyzes Kamala Harris's statements regarding AR-15s and 'assault weapons.' He argues that the term 'assault weapon' is a political construct, not a technical firearm classification. Noir highlights the hypocrisy of banning weapons that law enforcement and government agencies use for protection, asserting that civilians have a greater need for such firearms for self-defense, hunting, and sport. The analysis emphasizes that the design purpose of firearms like the AR-15, in civilian hands, is for defense and saving lives, contrary to political rhetoric.

Quick Summary

Colion Noir argues that 'assault weapon' is a political term, not a real firearm classification, designed to mislead. He points out that law enforcement uses similar firearms for protection, suggesting civilians have a greater need for defensive tools like the AR-15, which are used for saving lives, not just for war.

Chapters

  1. 00:03Kamala Harris on Assault Weapons
  2. 00:38Assault Weapon Effects on Humans
  3. 00:40Partisan Issue and Second Amendment
  4. 01:26Government Agencies and Assault Weapons
  5. 01:50Purpose of So-Called Assault Weapons
  6. 02:13People's Right to Own Weapons
  7. 02:36AR-15's and Criminal Use
  8. 03:13People's Rights
  9. 03:57Saving Lives Quickly
  10. 04:18Anti-Gunner Terminology

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the primary argument against the term 'assault weapon' as used in political discourse?

The term 'assault weapon' is a politically manufactured phrase, not a genuine firearm classification. It's used to confuse the public and evoke fear, often misrepresenting semi-automatic rifles as fully automatic machine guns, despite their distinct operational differences.

Why does Colion Noir argue that civilians have a greater need for firearms like the AR-15 than government agencies?

Noir contends that while government agencies use these firearms for defense, civilians have a more critical need due to the immediate nature of threats and the time it takes for law enforcement to arrive. Civilians rely on these tools for personal safety, home defense, and protection against criminals.

What is the stated design purpose of firearms like the AR-15 in civilian hands, according to the video?

In the hands of law-abiding citizens, firearms like the AR-15 are argued to be designed for saving lives quickly. Their utility extends to self-defense, home protection, hunting, and sport shooting, contrary to the political narrative that they are solely weapons of war.

How does the video address the use of similar firearms by law enforcement and government agencies?

The video highlights the hypocrisy of banning firearms labeled 'assault weapons' for civilians while law enforcement, the FBI, and the Secret Service possess and utilize them for protection. This suggests their utility for defense is recognized by those in authority.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Colion Noir

View all →