Larry Pratt on Piers Morgan Live Part 1

Published on July 6, 2017
Duration: 10:25

This video features a debate on gun control, with Larry Pratt arguing that gun-free zones are where crimes occur and that law-abiding citizens should be armed for self-defense. He contends that the problem lies in evil hearts, not firearms, and advocates for the repeal of gun control laws that hinder self-protection. Pratt also highlights areas with legal firearm carry as having lower murder rates compared to cities with stricter gun laws.

Quick Summary

The argument for allowing citizens to carry firearms centers on self-defense, asserting that law-abiding individuals need to protect themselves from criminals, particularly in areas with delayed police response. It's contended that restricting gun ownership empowers criminals and leaves responsible citizens vulnerable. Furthermore, the debate suggests that gun violence is more prevalent in gun-free zones, while areas with legal firearm carry experience lower crime rates.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction to Gun Control Arguments
  2. 00:15Concerns about Arming Teachers
  3. 00:31Guns Outside Schools
  4. 00:46US Gun Ownership Statistics
  5. 01:05Debate on Gun Crime Rates
  6. 01:39More Guns for Less Murder?
  7. 01:46Problem Areas and Gun Laws
  8. 02:16Gun Murder Rates in UK vs. Fairfax County
  9. 02:37Guns and Safety
  10. 02:49AR-15 as a Weapon of Choice
  11. 03:08President's Stance on Assault Weapons
  12. 03:14Banning Gun Control Laws
  13. 03:27Effectiveness of Bans in England
  14. 03:32People Defending Themselves
  15. 03:42Countering Gun Murder Rate Claims
  16. 04:01Violent Crime Rates Comparison
  17. 04:12America Not the Wild West
  18. 04:16Problem in Cities and Schools
  19. 04:29Victims vs. Self-Defense
  20. 04:37Moral Obscurity of Gun Control Advocates
  21. 04:51Coherent Argument Lacking
  22. 05:04Ignoring Known Facts
  23. 05:15Areas with Freely Available Guns
  24. 05:27Cities with Cracked Down Guns
  25. 05:34Mrs. Lanza's Firearms
  26. 05:53Evil in the World
  27. 06:06Protecting Oneself
  28. 06:10Evil Young Man and Firearms
  29. 06:45Americans with Firearms at Home
  30. 06:53Mother's Poor Judgment
  31. 07:07Law-Abiding Gun Owners
  32. 07:14Paying for Others' Shortcomings
  33. 07:25Argument Against Banning Self-Defense
  34. 07:31Senator Feinstein's Stance
  35. 07:40No Use for AR-15 Type Firearms
  36. 07:47Commending Firearm Use
  37. 08:06Assault Weapons in Mass Shootings
  38. 08:19High-Capacity Magazines
  39. 08:27Solution: Similar Weapons for All?
  40. 08:40Korean Merchants and Firearms
  41. 08:53Arming Teachers Again
  42. 09:11Post-Sandy Hook Response
  43. 09:14Answer to Mass Shootings
  44. 09:23Impunity and Mass Shootings
  45. 09:31The Second Amendment
  46. 09:34Laws Against Self-Defense
  47. 09:49Concealed Carry Permit Laws
  48. 09:54Lobbying Against Restrictive Laws
  49. 10:02Enabling Murderers
  50. 10:14Soaring Weapon Sales

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main argument for allowing citizens to carry firearms?

The primary argument is for self-defense. Proponents believe that law-abiding citizens should be armed to protect themselves from criminals, especially in areas where police response may be delayed. They argue that restricting gun ownership empowers criminals and leaves law-abiding citizens vulnerable.

Where do gun violence incidents tend to occur, according to this debate?

The argument presented is that gun violence and mass shootings disproportionately occur in 'gun-free zones' or areas with strict gun control laws. Conversely, areas where firearms are legally carried and accessible by responsible citizens are claimed to have lower rates of violent crime.

What is the view on banning specific types of firearms like the AR-15?

The perspective shared is that banning specific firearms, such as the AR-15, is not an effective solution to gun violence. It's argued that the problem lies in the intent of individuals and the presence of evil, rather than the tool itself. Banning certain guns is seen as penalizing law-abiding citizens without addressing the root causes of violence.

How does the debate address the issue of school safety and firearms?

One viewpoint suggests arming teachers and school faculty with concealed carry permits as a means of immediate defense against potential attackers. This is contrasted with the idea that gun-free schools become targets, and armed personnel could deter or stop threats before significant harm occurs.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Gun Owners of America

View all →