Legal Scholar Interview Series: Robert J. Cottrol

Published on January 2, 2025
Duration: 53:30

This interview with Professor Robert J. Cottrol delves into the historical interpretation of the Second Amendment, tracing its evolution from English common law through the founding era, the 14th Amendment, and culminating in landmark Supreme Court decisions like Heller and McDonald. The discussion highlights the shift from a collective rights interpretation, often driven by 20th-century gun control movements, back to an individual right focused on self-defense, as affirmed by the Supreme Court.

Quick Summary

The Supreme Court, in Heller v. DC (2008) and McDonald v. Chicago (2010), affirmed that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms, primarily for self-defense, not just for militia service. This interpretation evolved from historical English and colonial contexts, with the 14th Amendment later extending this protection against state governments.

Chapters

  1. 00:01Introduction: Legal Scholar Series
  2. 01:01Book Focus: History of the Right to Arms
  3. 01:23Individual vs. Collective Right Debate
  4. 03:10The Road to Heller v. DC
  5. 05:01English and Colonial Right to Arms
  6. 07:20Founding Era Debates on the Second Amendment
  7. 10:11Madison's Drafting of the Second Amendment
  8. 13:4419th Century Commentaries and Early Gun Control
  9. 14:13Impact of the 14th Amendment on Rights
  10. 18:3014th Amendment and State Limitations
  11. 19:03Shift in Interpretation: Selena v. Blakesley
  12. 22:03World War I and Firearms Familiarization
  13. 24:12The National Firearms Act of 1934
  14. 27:29US v. Miller (1939) Summary
  15. 31:32Home Guards in World War II
  16. 36:011960s Gun Control Movement and Collective Rights
  17. 43:38Scholarship on the Individual Right
  18. 48:37Supreme Court Decisions: Heller and McDonald
  19. 52:44Book and Author Information

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the primary interpretation of the Second Amendment affirmed by the Supreme Court?

The Supreme Court, in landmark decisions like Heller v. DC (2008) and McDonald v. Chicago (2010), has affirmed that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms, primarily for self-defense, rather than solely a collective right tied to militia service.

How did the 14th Amendment impact the Second Amendment?

The 14th Amendment was intended to apply the Bill of Rights, including the Second Amendment, to state governments. While initially hindered by the Slaughterhouse Cases, subsequent rulings like McDonald v. Chicago incorporated the individual right to bear arms against state infringement.

What historical factors influenced the right to bear arms in colonial America?

In colonial America, the right to arms was robust due to a lack of established military and police presence, necessitating self-reliance for defense against threats like hostile colonies, indigenous populations, and the need for slave control. This necessity broadened the scope beyond the English model.

When did the collective rights interpretation of the Second Amendment become prominent?

The collective rights interpretation gained significant traction in the late 1960s and 1970s, fueled by the gun control movement and amplified by media narratives. However, polling data from that era indicated that the majority of Americans still viewed the Second Amendment as protecting an individual right.

What role did scholarship play in affirming the individual right to bear arms?

In the 1980s, scholars like Don Kates, Stephen Halbrook, and David Hardy produced influential research that made the individual rights interpretation intellectually respectable. This scholarship, along with historical analysis by others, laid the groundwork for the Supreme Court's later decisions.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from NRA

View all →