MAJOR NEWS! Red Flag Law Ruled UNCONSTITUTIONAL

Published on December 31, 2022
Duration: 4:58

This expert-level analysis from Guns & Gadgets discusses the New York State Supreme Court ruling in GW vs CN, which declared Red Flag Laws unconstitutional. The ruling, citing Heller, McDonald, and Bruen, emphasizes that firearm regulations must have historical precedent dating back to 1791 to be constitutional. The speaker argues Red Flag Laws infringe upon Second Amendment rights without due process and hopes this case will be appealed to the Supreme Court to nullify such laws nationwide.

Quick Summary

New York's Red Flag Laws have been declared unconstitutional in the GW vs CN case by Justice Thomas Moran. Citing Heller, McDonald, and Bruen, the ruling states that firearm regulations must have historical precedent from 1791. This decision could impact Red Flag Laws nationwide, with the speaker arguing they infringe on Second Amendment rights without due process.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction & NY Red Flag Ruling
  2. 00:15Case Background Details: GW vs CN
  3. 00:43Judge's Ruling & National Impact
  4. 01:06Second Amendment & Historical Test
  5. 01:54Petitioner Credibility & Order Ineffectiveness
  6. 02:24Self-Defense vs. Government Intervention
  7. 03:22Future of Red Flag Laws & SCOTUS
  8. 04:19Concluding Thoughts & Call to Action

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the outcome of the GW vs CN case regarding Red Flag Laws in New York?

In the GW vs CN case, Justice Thomas Moran of the New York State Supreme Court ruled New York's Red Flag Laws unconstitutional. This decision is based on the Second Amendment's requirement for historical precedent in firearm regulations, dating back to 1791.

What legal principles were cited in the ruling against Red Flag Laws?

The ruling cited landmark Supreme Court cases such as Heller, McDonald, and Bruen. These decisions affirm the individual right to bear arms and mandate that any firearm regulation must be historically consistent with traditions from 1791 to be considered constitutional.

What is the potential national impact of the New York Red Flag Law ruling?

The ruling in GW vs CN, which found New York's Red Flag Laws unconstitutional, has the potential to set a precedent and impact the legality of Red Flag Laws across the entire United States if it is appealed and upheld by higher courts.

Why does the speaker consider Red Flag Laws unconstitutional?

The speaker views Red Flag Laws as unconstitutional infringements on Second Amendment rights, arguing they lack due process and historical precedent. He emphasizes personal self-defense over government-issued orders, which he believes are ineffective for ensuring safety.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Guns & Gadgets 2nd Amendment News

View all →