Mathew Larosiere was targeted by Cali for releasing 3D gun printing instructions. LIB for full vid.

Published on March 3, 2026
Duration: 1:30

This video features Matthew Larosiere, a gun rights attorney, discussing California's attempts to regulate machine code for CNC machines and 3D gun printing instructions. The NRA is highlighted for its defense of free speech and the right to bear arms, with Larosiere explaining how California's lawsuit aims to regulate access to instructions, effectively targeting the entire internet. The core issue revolves around the right to self-manufacture arms, with California's stance being that accessible files for unlicensed individuals violate the law.

Quick Summary

California is attempting to regulate machine code for CNC machines as gun manufacturing code and is targeting 3D gun printing instructions. The NRA is defending free speech and the right to bear arms, arguing that California's lawsuit attempts to regulate access to instructions, effectively targeting the entire internet. The core issue is the right to make arms by oneself.

Chapters

  1. 00:00CA Regulation of Gun Code
  2. 01:07Right to Make Arms Explained

Frequently Asked Questions

What is California trying to regulate regarding firearms?

California is attempting to regulate machine code used for CNC machines as gun manufacturing code and is targeting instructions for 3D gun printing. Their lawsuit aims to control access to these digital files, which they argue violates the law if accessible by unlicensed individuals in the state.

How is the NRA involved in the debate over 3D gun printing?

The NRA is actively defending free speech and the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. They are opposing California's legal actions that seek to regulate access to digital firearm manufacturing instructions, viewing it as an overreach that could impact the entire internet.

What is the core legal argument concerning the right to make arms?

The central issue is the fundamental right of an individual to manufacture arms for themselves, without needing explicit permission from another party. This right is being challenged by regulations that attempt to control the dissemination and accessibility of digital manufacturing information.

What are the implications of California's lawsuit on internet access?

California's lawsuit is seen as an attempt to regulate access to instructions, which could effectively mean regulating a significant portion of the internet. The argument is that if a file can be accessed by someone in California without a license, it constitutes a violation, creating a broad regulatory scope.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from NRA

View all →