Matt Carmel - Association of New Jersey Rifle and Pistol Clubs

Published on October 19, 2010
Duration: 6:48

Matt Carmel, Executive Vice President of the Association of New Jersey Rifle and Pistol Clubs, discusses the ineffectiveness of New Jersey's gun control laws. He argues that criminals do not adhere to laws, citing a recent incident where legally owned firearms were used in a crime despite existing statutes. Carmel also critiques proposed legislation that would impose a $500 annual fee for exercising the right to carry, comparing it to poll taxes and literacy tests, and suggests such fees are unconstitutional and unlikely to stand.

Quick Summary

New Jersey's gun control laws are criticized for their ineffectiveness, as criminals do not adhere to them. Proposed measures like a $500 annual fee for carrying a firearm are deemed unconstitutional 'poll taxes.' Supreme Court rulings are expected to challenge existing regulations, potentially leading to concealed carry rights in the state.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction of Matt Carmel
  2. 00:48Recent Shooting Incident in NJ
  3. 01:34Ineffectiveness of NJ Gun Control
  4. 02:13Devil's Advocate: Reader Comment
  5. 03:07Response to Reader's Logic
  6. 04:19NJ Gun Laws and Legal Challenges
  7. 05:06Proposed Carry Fee Bill
  8. 06:01Comparison to Free Speech Fees
  9. 06:33Conclusion

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are New Jersey's gun control laws considered ineffective?

New Jersey's gun control laws are argued to be ineffective because criminals, by definition, do not follow laws. Recent incidents show that individuals with criminal histories can still obtain and use firearms illegally, bypassing existing statutes and restrictions like magazine capacity limits or purchase limitations.

What is the main criticism of the proposed $500 annual fee for carrying a firearm in New Jersey?

The proposed $500 annual fee for carrying a firearm in New Jersey is criticized as an unconstitutional 'poll tax' and a revenue-generating scheme that infringes upon a fundamental right. This fee is seen as a barrier to exercising Second Amendment rights, similar to historical disenfranchisement tactics.

How might Supreme Court rulings impact New Jersey's gun control laws?

Supreme Court decisions like Heller v. D.C. and McDonald v. City of Chicago affirm an individual's right to bear arms. These rulings are expected to challenge the foundation of New Jersey's restrictive gun control regulations, potentially leading to the allowance of concealed carry rights in the state.

What is the argument against restricting magazine capacity and firearm appearance?

The argument is that restricting magazine capacity to 15 rounds or banning firearms that 'look scary' does not effectively reduce gun violence. These measures are seen as targeting law-abiding citizens rather than deterring criminals, who will find ways to circumvent such regulations.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from NRA

View all →