Patents and the Super Safety | The Facts

Published on August 15, 2025
Duration: 19:26

This video provides an in-depth analysis of patent claims surrounding the 'Super Safety' trigger mechanism for AR-15 platforms. The instructor clarifies that the original FR-15 patent is irrelevant, while the Blakeley patent represents prior art for the Super Safety's cam reset function. The primary focus is on dissecting US patent 12038247, detailing its claims of infringement and demonstrating why the Super Safety's design, which utilizes user-selectable stacked cams and maintains disconnector function, does not violate the patent's scope, which centers on disabling the disconnector for select-fire.

Quick Summary

The Super Safety trigger mechanism's core cam reset function is based on prior art from the expired Blakeley patent. Unlike US patent 12038247, which claims a select-fire system by disabling the disconnector, the Super Safety utilizes user-selectable stacked cams and maintains disconnector functionality, thus not infringing on the patent's claims.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction to the Super Safety
  2. 00:29The Original FR-15 Patent (10514223)
  3. 01:36The Expired Blakeley Patent (73983723) as Prior Art
  4. 02:36The Patent of Contention: US Patent 12038247
  5. 03:54Illustration of the 247 Patent's Mechanism
  6. 05:02How the 247 Patent Claims Select Fire
  7. 06:18Claim 1 Analysis of the 247 Patent
  8. 07:44New Claims Added to the 247 Patent
  9. 09:07Analyzing the Lawsuit's Claim Chart
  10. 10:53Key Clauses in the 247 Patent Claims
  11. 11:05Claim Language: Standard Semi-Automatic Position
  12. 12:04Claim Language: Force Reset Position
  13. 13:02Visualizing the Cam in Second Position
  14. 13:35Problem 1: Non-Functional Claims
  15. 13:59Problem 2: Twisting Patent Language
  16. 15:26The Super Safety's Actual Operation
  17. 16:36Summary of Patent Issues
  18. 17:06Super Safety's Selection Mechanism vs. 247 Patent
  19. 17:47Two Reasons Claims Are Not a Problem
  20. 19:14Conclusion

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the original FR-15 patent apply to the Super Safety trigger?

No, the original FR-15 patent (10514223) is completely irrelevant to the Super Safety. Its claims focus on a different mechanism involving a specific hammer-contact surface and a locking bar, which do not apply to the Super Safety's design.

What is the role of the Blakeley patent in relation to the Super Safety?

The Blakeley patent (73983723), now expired, describes a cam mechanism that resets the trigger when the bolt carrier moves rearward. This mechanism is considered prior art and forms the basis for the Super Safety's fundamental cam reset function.

What does US patent 12038247 claim regarding select-fire mechanisms?

US patent 12038247 claims a select-fire system that combines a cam reset feature with a method of disabling the disconnector to achieve different firing modes. This patent is the primary source of alleged infringement claims against the Super Safety.

How does the Super Safety's operation differ from the claims in US patent 12038247?

The Super Safety uses user-selectable stacked cams for different reset modes and crucially, the disconnector always remains active and functional. In contrast, US patent 12038247's claims focus on disabling the disconnector to achieve select-fire, a mechanism not employed by the Super Safety.

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Hoffman Tactical

View all →