Possible ATF Ban On M855 & SS109 5.56 Ammunition (HD)

Published on February 14, 2015
Duration: 5:15

This video discusses a proposed ATF ban on M855 and SS109 5.56 ammunition, citing their potential use in AR pistols and ability to penetrate body armor. The speaker argues this logic is flawed, as other 5.56 ammunition can also penetrate common law enforcement body armor. The video encourages viewers to contact the ATF within the 30-day response period to voice their opposition, drawing parallels to a previous NFA item trust ownership proposal that was withdrawn due to public backlash.

Quick Summary

The ATF has proposed a ban on M855 and SS109 5.56 ammunition, citing their use in AR pistols and potential to penetrate body armor. Critics argue this logic is flawed, as other 5.56 ammo can also penetrate common law enforcement body armor. A 30-day public comment period is open, and viewers are urged to contact the ATF and their representatives.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: ATF's Proposed Ban
  2. 00:08ATF's Action: Proposed Prohibition
  3. 00:27M855 & SS109 Variants Explained
  4. 00:50ATF's Rationale: AR Pistols
  5. 01:00Current Pistol Ammo Regulations
  6. 01:30Penetration Argument Analysis
  7. 01:56Reading the ATF Letter Verbatim
  8. 02:13Key Portion: 'Armor-Piercing' Classification
  9. 02:46Comparison to .30-06 AP
  10. 02:55History of Similar ATF Proposals
  11. 03:09NFA Item Trust Ownership Backlash
  12. 03:42Public Response Period
  13. 04:00Government Lists & Engagement
  14. 04:15Call to Action: Contact ATF
  15. 04:38Ammunition's Role in Harm
  16. 04:48Sharing the Video & Collective Action
  17. 04:56Conclusion & Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the ATF proposing to ban regarding ammunition?

The ATF has proposed a ban on the sale, transfer, and manufacturing of M855 and SS109 variants of 5.56 ammunition. They are reclassifying this ammunition as 'armor-piercing' due to its potential use in AR pistols and its steel-tipped design.

What is the ATF's primary justification for banning M855 and SS109 ammunition?

The ATF's stated reason is the widespread availability of AR pistols, which they now consider a platform for this ammunition. They argue that this makes it 'pistol ammunition' and that its steel tip can enhance penetration capabilities, potentially against law enforcement body armor.

What are the arguments against the ATF's proposed ban on M855/SS109 ammo?

Critics argue the ATF's logic is flawed because other common 5.56 ammunition can also penetrate standard law enforcement body armor. They also point out that ammunition itself is inert and requires a user to cause harm, and that the ban is based on the platform rather than the ammunition's inherent properties.

How can the public respond to the ATF's proposed ammunition ban?

The ATF has provided a 30-day window for public comment. Viewers are encouraged to contact the ATF directly and also reach out to their elected officials to voice their opinions and concerns about the proposed ban.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Mrgunsngear Channel

View all →