Required Pa Rin Ba Ang Threat Assessment for PTCFOR? | Discussion with Atty. Brian Go

Published on June 14, 2025
Duration: 11:06

This discussion clarifies the amendment to RA10591 concerning the Permit to Carry Firearms Outside Residence (PTCFOR). Attorney Brian Go explains that the 'threat assessment' requirement for PTCFOR has been removed in House Bill 11539. While some provisions related to threat assessment remain in the law, their application to PTCFOR is no longer mandated, though they might be used for other purposes like gun ban exemptions.

Quick Summary

The threat assessment requirement for obtaining a Permit to Carry Firearms Outside Residence (PTCFOR) has been removed in the amendment to RA10591, as detailed in House Bill 11539. This change reflects a legislative intent to make firearms licensing more accessible. While some related provisions remain, they are not applicable to PTCFOR applications.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Threat Assessment for PTCFOR
  2. 00:11Guests: Guns Pinoy, Charles, Atty. Brian Go
  3. 01:31Main Concern: Threat Assessment Requirement
  4. 02:03Sharing Screen: House Bill 11539 Provisions
  5. 02:21Analysis: Strikethrough and Added Text
  6. 03:07Highlighted Portion: Threat or Imminent Danger Clause
  7. 03:20Strikethrough Meaning: Intention to Remove
  8. 03:48Legal Principle: Statutory Construction
  9. 04:03Following Intent: Removal of Threat Assessment
  10. 04:17Source of Confusion: Residual Wording
  11. 04:36Clerical Errors and Court Fixes
  12. 04:44TA Not Required for PTCFOR
  13. 05:07Added Provisions from Senate Hearing
  14. 05:27PTCFOR: Requirement for TA Removed
  15. 05:40Likely Scenarios: IRR Usage
  16. 06:04Clear Intent: Removal of Threat Assessment
  17. 06:26Directive for Accessible Firearms Licenses
  18. 06:48Clarification: Buried Provision
  19. 07:05Technically Not Required
  20. 07:30Confusion: Bottom Part Wording
  21. 08:12Possibility of Threat Assessment Disappearance
  22. 08:31Not Necessarily PTCFOR
  23. 09:03Assumption: Gunband Exemption or No Use
  24. 09:16Clear: Removal from the Top Section
  25. 09:20Case Point: Removed Provision
  26. 09:35Thank You to Attorney Brian
  27. 09:42Simplifying: Possibility of Removal
  28. 09:50IRR Hearing and Stakeholders
  29. 10:16Knowledge of Drafting Intent
  30. 10:33Implementation Remains to Be Seen
  31. 10:40Stakeholder Input for IRR
  32. 10:52Spirit of the Law and Rationality
  33. 11:01Conclusion

Frequently Asked Questions

Has the threat assessment requirement been removed for PTCFOR in the Philippines?

Yes, the amendment to RA10591, specifically House Bill 11539, has removed the explicit requirement for a threat assessment when applying for a Permit to Carry Firearms Outside Residence (PTCFOR).

What is the legislative intent behind removing the threat assessment for PTCFOR?

The legislative intent was to make firearms licenses, including PTCFOR, more accessible. This aligns with directives from authorities aiming to streamline the process for eligible citizens.

Could the threat assessment still be used for other firearm-related purposes?

While removed for PTCFOR, remaining provisions mentioning threat assessment might be utilized for other purposes, such as gun ban exemptions. The exact application will likely be clarified in the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR).

Why might there still be confusion about the threat assessment requirement?

Confusion can arise from residual wording in the amended law that was not fully removed or clarified. However, legal experts emphasize that the strike-through of the specific provision for PTCFOR signifies its removal.

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Guns Pinoy

View all →