The Case to Save the FFL Industry
This video discusses the critical lawsuit Richards v. Nuome, challenging California's statute (and Washington's identical HB 2118) mandating 24/7 video surveillance for FFLs. The lawsuit argues this violates the Fourth Amendment (unreasonable search), Fifth Amendment (unlawful taking), and First Amendment (chilling protected speech and association). The speaker, William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, emphasizes the potential impact on the entire FFL industry nationwide.










