The Dept Of Defense "Acquisition" of Firearms Is ILLEGAL!!

Published on August 21, 2023
0

This video critically examines the Department of Defense's (DOD) acquisition of civilian firearms, arguing it's illegal without a defined military mission. The speaker, demonstrating high authority on federal procurement, references GAO findings and historical policies like DOD A-109, asserting that using acquisition contracts to force technology adoption (smart guns, microstamping) bypasses legislative processes. The analysis highlights potential market impacts and financial leverage over manufacturers.

Quick Summary

The Department of Defense's (DOD) acquisition of civilian firearms is argued to be illegal without a defined military mission, according to expert analysis referencing GAO concerns and historical policies like DOD A-109. Using contracts to mandate technologies like smart guns is also criticized as an improper bypass of legislative authority.

Chapters

  1. 00:00GAO and Executive Orders on DOD Firearms Acquisition
  2. 00:43Historical DOD Acquisition Policies (A-109)
  3. 01:18Market Impact of Government Firearms Acquisition
  4. 02:40Smart Tech & Microstamping via Acquisition Contracts
  5. 03:42Conclusion: Legality Without Mission

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the Department of Defense's acquisition of firearms considered potentially illegal?

The speaker argues that DOD firearm acquisitions are illegal without a clearly defined military mission, citing historical policies like DOD A-109. Using acquisition contracts to force technologies like smart guns or microstamping bypasses legislative processes and lacks proper legal foundation according to GAO concerns.

What historical policies govern DOD firearm acquisition?

Policies from the 1970s and a significant overhaul in 1981, known as DOD A-109, mandate that the Department of Defense must establish a specific mission or requirement before acquiring any weapon systems or firearms.

How might DOD firearm acquisition affect the civilian market?

Acquiring civilian firearms for the military removes them from the public market, potentially reducing availability. Furthermore, large government contracts can give the DOD significant financial leverage over manufacturers, possibly forcing them to prioritize government orders.

What is the controversy surrounding 'smart tech' and microstamping in DOD contracts?

The government is allegedly using acquisition contracts to compel manufacturers to adopt 'smart gun' technologies and microstamping. The speaker contends this is an illegal method to implement such changes unless directly tied to a specific military mission requirement.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from GFG

View all →