The Law That Limits Self Defense and Why It's Time to Be Overturned

Gun Owners of America (GOA) has filed a lawsuit, GOA v. Platkin, challenging New Jersey's near-complete ban on hollow-point ammunition. The lawsuit argues that this ban, in effect since 1978, violates the Second Amendment by prohibiting the possession and self-defense use of commonly used and effective ammunition outside the home. The ban restricts citizens to less effective Full Metal Jacket (FMJ) ammunition for self-defense, even in densely populated areas.

This video features constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith critically analyzing New Jersey's post-Bruen gun control legislation. Smith, a published legal scholar and host of 'The Four Boxes Diner,' argues that the state's broad 'sensitive places' restrictions are unconstitutional due to a lack of historical analogues. He highlights legal arguments made before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and debunks a key historical statute cited by the state.

Mark W. Smith, a Constitutional Attorney and two-time Gundie Award winner, discusses a new study by Dr. Angus McClellen on 'sensitive places' gun bans. The research suggests such bans are only constitutional if the government provides comprehensive security, citing historical precedents and the philosophy of Cesare Beccaria. This information is presented ahead of oral arguments in the Koons/Siegel v. New Jersey case before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

This video details a New Jersey state law that bans hollow point ammunition for self-defense purposes, classifying it as 'Dum Dums' or 'Hollow noses'. The Coalition of New Jersey Firearm Owners (GOA) has filed a lawsuit, GOA v. Platkin, challenging this ban as unconstitutional and a violation of Second Amendment rights. The law's historical inconsistency and carve-outs for law enforcement are highlighted as key points of contention.

This video provides an in-depth legal analysis of a Federal District Court decision concerning New Jersey's ban on AR-15s and large-capacity magazines. The speaker, a constitutional attorney, critiques the judge's reasoning, particularly regarding the 'in common use' test and its application to both firearms and magazines. The analysis highlights potential errors in the court's interpretation of Supreme Court precedent like Heller and Bruen, suggesting the decision may be overturned on appeal.

The video highlights the perceived hypocrisy of the federal government, specifically the IRS, arming itself with Smith & Wesson AR-style rifles and hollow-point ammunition, while simultaneously advocating for restrictions on these same items for citizens. The speaker argues that the government's actions contradict their stated concerns about the dangers of such firearms and ammunition.

William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law and a practicing attorney, provides expert guidance on how to legally respond if your vehicle is surrounded by a mob. He emphasizes understanding the nuances of self-defense laws, particularly concerning the use of force, and stresses that the primary goal should always be de-escalation and safe escape when possible. The instruction highlights the critical difference between property damage and threats to human life when justifying defensive actions.

This video, featuring legal expert William Kirk, delves into the complex legalities of using deadly force against law enforcement officers when faced with unlawful aggression. It clarifies the foundational principles of self-defense, including necessity, reasonableness, and proportionality, and outlines the four legal justifications for employing lethal force. The discussion highlights the protections afforded by the Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground laws, particularly within one's home, and differentiates between the legal right to self-defense and the tactical considerations of engaging with law enforcement.

This video features William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, an expert in firearms law, discussing the growing trend of county sheriffs and state associations opposing federal gun control measures. The primary focus is on Arkansas, detailing Act 1012 and Arkansas Code 21-1-904, which aim to prevent state cooperation with federal enforcement of certain firearms regulations, particularly the ATF's rule on pistol stabilizing braces.

William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, provides expert insights into ATF firearm inspection authority. He clarifies that the ATF cannot demand inspections of non-NFA firearms or NFA items without a warrant, dispelling common misconceptions about Fourth Amendment rights for firearm owners. The video emphasizes that FFLs have different inspection rules than private citizens.