The Media Is Lying To You About Mass Shootings & Here's The Proof

Published on January 18, 2024
Duration: 35:53

This video critically examines the definition and reporting of mass shootings, arguing that organizations like the Gun Violence Archive (GVA) are biased gun control groups. It highlights how GVA's broad definition, including gang violence and robberies, inflates numbers used by politicians and media to push for stricter gun laws. The discussion delves into the disproportionate impact of crime in inner cities, the role of political policies in creating these environments, and how restrictive gun control measures disarm vulnerable populations, particularly minorities, who need firearms for self-defense. The video also critiques the cost and accessibility barriers of concealed carry permits and background checks, suggesting they are designed to disarm rather than enhance public safety.

Quick Summary

Organizations like the Gun Violence Archive (GVA) define mass shootings broadly, including gang violence and robberies, which critics argue inflates numbers used by gun control advocates. Policies like high permit fees and complex background checks disproportionately disarm vulnerable populations, particularly minorities in high-crime areas, who need firearms for self-defense.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction & Echo Apology
  2. 00:21Critique of Gun Violence Archive
  3. 01:01GVA's Gun Control Agenda
  4. 01:47Defining Mass Shootings: GVA vs. FBI
  5. 02:56Types of Shootings GVA Includes
  6. 03:30FBI's Active Shooter Definition
  7. 04:24Media & Democrats Use GVA Data
  8. 05:27Why Gang Violence Isn't Newsworthy
  9. 06:07Insidious Reasons for Ignoring Inner City Violence
  10. 07:20Concentration of Murders in U.S.
  11. 08:09Violent Crime Not Related to Guns
  12. 08:22Impact of Liberal Policies on Crime
  13. 09:37Broader Victims of Violent Crime
  14. 10:13Policies Creating Environments for Violence
  15. 10:47Fatherlessness and Crime
  16. 11:41Leaders Understand Problems, Offer Wrong Solutions
  17. 13:20Government's Role in Fatherlessness
  18. 14:10Democrat-Run Cities and Gun Violence
  19. 15:12Who Benefits Most from Guns
  20. 15:33Concealed Carry Permits in Los Angeles
  21. 16:35Illinois vs. Indiana Permit Costs
  22. 18:12Critique of Universal Background Checks
  23. 20:01Police Importance vs. Self-Defense
  24. 20:32Elitism and Control in Gun Control
  25. 21:06Population Control Through Disarmament
  26. 21:10Intangible Aspects of Firearm Ownership
  27. 22:13Texas Permit Fee Reduction Debate
  28. 23:11Constitutional Carry Debate
  29. 24:37Removing Barriers Encourages Training
  30. 26:19Arguments for Constitutional Carry
  31. 27:46Disingenuousness of Gun Control Bills
  32. 29:28Background Check System Flaws
  33. 30:13Mistakes in Background Checks
  34. 31:17Reasonable Fixes for Gun Control
  35. 33:33Avoiding a National Gun Registry
  36. 34:34Racist Implications of Gun Control
  37. 35:04CrimeResearch.org Resources
  38. 35:33Conclusion: Guns Aren't Political

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the Gun Violence Archive (GVA) define a mass shooting?

The Gun Violence Archive (GVA) defines a mass shooting as an incident where four or more people are injured or killed. However, critics argue this definition is too broad and includes events like gang violence or robberies, which inflates the numbers used to advocate for gun control.

What are the main criticisms of current gun control policies regarding self-defense?

Critics argue that gun control policies, such as high permit fees and complex background checks, disproportionately disarm vulnerable populations, particularly minorities in high-crime urban areas, who need firearms for self-defense. These measures are seen as creating barriers rather than enhancing safety.

What is the argument regarding the concentration of crime in the U.S.?

The argument is that murders and violent crime are heavily concentrated in very small geographic areas, often involving gang activity over drug turf. These areas are predominantly populated by Black and Hispanic individuals, who are also negatively impacted by crime through depressed property values and reduced convenience.

How do policies like constitutional carry affect firearm training?

When permit requirements are removed through constitutional carry, individuals are more likely to voluntarily seek firearm training. This is because the barrier of mandatory, often costly, training is gone, allowing people to explore firearm ownership and safety education more freely and based on genuine interest.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Colion Noir

View all →