Trump's Anti-Gun Pick For The 9th Circuit

This video discusses how California's legislative session is being overshadowed by a political power grab through gerrymandering, impacting Second Amendment legislation. The CRPA's legislative director, Rick Travis, explains how proposed bills like the Glock ban (AB 1127), ghost gun ban (AB 1263), and CCW regulations (AB 1078) are being sidelined. The focus shifts to ACA 88, a constitutional amendment and new congressional maps, alongside SB 280, which allocate significant funds for this redistricting effort. Travis argues this is a move by Governor Newsom to secure political power for future election cycles, potentially leading to costly litigation and a disregard for voter representation.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has struck down California's ammunition background check law, deeming it unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. This ruling, based on the Bruen standard, establishes that ammunition is protected by the Second Amendment and that the state's requirement for government approval, fees, and delays on every ammunition purchase is an unconstitutional burden. The decision could have national implications for similar laws in other states.

This video provides an expert-level analysis of the Rodi v. Bonta case before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, focusing on California's ammunition regulations. CRPA President Chuck Michel, an expert in Second Amendment law, discusses the favorable composition of the en banc panel and the potential implications of a victory, including a possible Supreme Court appeal. The discussion highlights the strategic application of the Bruen test and the ongoing efforts to protect firearm rights in California.

This video discusses the significant legal development in the Rode v. Bont case concerning California's ammunition background check system. It highlights the selection of an 11-judge en banc panel for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, noting a majority of Republican-appointed judges, which is seen as a positive sign for Second Amendment advocates. The discussion also touches upon the legal basis for challenging such laws and the historical trend of the Supreme Court striking down state-level firearm restrictions.

This video discusses the 400% increase in California's ammunition background check fee, raising it from $1 to $5, effective July 1st. It also analyzes the Ninth Circuit's ruling in the Nenv Bonta case, which found California's 'one gun a month' law unconstitutional. The discussion highlights the legal basis for these changes, including the financial unsustainability of the background check system and the application of the Bruen decision's historical tradition standard to firearm regulations.

This video provides an update on California Assembly Bill 1078, which proposes to change the state's firearm purchase limit from one per 30 days to three per month. The bill is moving quickly through the legislative process and is currently in the Public Safety Committee. The speaker emphasizes the potential negative impact on Second Amendment rights and urges Californians to contact their representatives.

This video features an expert assessment of a Second Amendment audit conducted in Edmond, Oklahoma, using an AR-style pistol. The content highlights a critical lack of training among law enforcement regarding the legal distinctions between AR pistols with stabilizing braces and Short-Barreled Rifles (SBRs), as evidenced by the confrontation with multiple officers. The expert emphasizes the potential risks and resource diversions associated with such audits, even when conducted legally.

This entry details a California DOJ firearm confiscation incident involving AR-15 pistols and 80% lower receivers. It highlights the importance of understanding California's complex firearm laws, particularly regarding registration deadlines and 'assault weapon' definitions. The analysis, provided by Joel Persinger of GunGuyTV, emphasizes the need for caution when interacting with law enforcement about firearm compliance and advises against displaying potentially problematic firearms on social media.

Joel Pursley of GunGuyTV provides expert guidance on legally avoiding AR-15 registration in California by making the rifle 'featureless'. He details the necessary modifications: replacing the adjustable stock with a straight one, swapping the flash hider for a muzzle brake, and installing a fin grip instead of a pistol grip. Pursley emphasizes that these changes allow owners to comply with state laws without entering their firearm into a government database, thus avoiding potential future restrictions or confiscation.

This video provides a comprehensive guide on navigating the aftermath of a defensive shooting, presented by Joel Persinger, a firearms instructor with personal experience. It outlines four critical levels of defense: tactical, criminal, civil, and emotional, emphasizing proactive legal and psychological preparation. The content is highly relevant for anyone considering or trained in the use of firearms for self-defense.