White House Makes Stunning Admission About Brace Rule

Published on June 12, 2023
Duration: 7:16

This video discusses the White House's admission regarding the ATF's brace rule, revealing that the administration actively pushed for increased enforcement of existing regulations on firearms accessories. The speaker highlights that the ATF's previous justification for reclassifying braces was misleading, as evidence suggests White House directives were the driving force. The video also notes the President's intent to veto House Joint Resolution 44, which aims to overturn the brace rule, indicating that legislative relief is unlikely and legal challenges are the primary recourse.

Quick Summary

The White House has admitted to actively pushing for increased enforcement of existing statutory requirements on firearms accessories, directly contradicting the ATF's claims that their brace rule change was solely due to observed misuse. The administration also intends to veto House Joint Resolution 44, signaling that legal challenges are the primary recourse for gun owners.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: White House Brace Rule Admission
  2. 00:09House Judiciary Committee Meeting with ATF
  3. 00:18ATF's 12-Year Precedent on Braces
  4. 00:35Connecting White House Influence to ATF Decision
  5. 01:09Sponsor: Sonoran Desert Institute (SDI)
  6. 01:32Grilling ATF Representatives on White House Interaction
  7. 02:19President's Veto Threat for H.J.Res. 44
  8. 02:52White House Statement of Administrative Policy
  9. 03:43Admission of Working Behind the Scenes
  10. 04:03Brace Not Originally a Regulated Item
  11. 04:20White House Working to Enforce Existing Regulation
  12. 04:44Tying ATF Flip-Flop to White House Directive
  13. 05:03Debunking ATF's Stated Reason for Change
  14. 05:31Proof of White House Enforcement Schemes
  15. 05:45Veto of House Joint Resolution 44
  16. 06:02Lack of Congressional Help
  17. 06:17Reliance on Court System for Relief
  18. 06:36Granted Injunctions as Indicator of Success
  19. 06:56Conclusion: No Government Relief Soon

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the White House's admission regarding the ATF brace rule?

The White House has admitted to actively pushing for increased enforcement of existing statutory requirements on firearms accessories, which directly contradicts the ATF's previous claims that their decision to reclassify braces was solely based on observed misuse and not external pressure.

Why did the ATF change its stance on firearm braces after 12 years?

While the ATF initially stated that braces were permissible and not subject to NFA regulations for a decade, the video reveals that the White House's admission indicates the change was driven by administration directives to enforce existing regulations, rather than solely by increased improper use as claimed by the ATF.

What is the significance of the President's veto threat concerning House Joint Resolution 44?

The President's stated intent to veto House Joint Resolution 44 signifies that the administration is committed to its stance on the brace rule and will not support legislative efforts to overturn it, suggesting that legal challenges are the primary avenue for relief for gun owners.

What is the recommended course of action for challenging the ATF's brace rule?

Given the White House's stance and the President's veto threat, the video suggests that legislative relief is unlikely. Therefore, the recommended course of action is to pursue legal challenges through the court system, citing the success of recent injunctions as evidence of a strong likelihood of winning on the merits.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Copper Jacket TV

View all →