Yes, Open Carry is Constitutionally Protected, and Here's Why

This discussion outlines the potential legal pathways for California's ammunition case following a favorable Ninth Circuit three-judge panel decision. It explores the possibilities of a 'super en banc' review or an appeal to the Supreme Court (SCOTUS), emphasizing the unprecedented nature of the case and its implications for Second Amendment rights.

This video discusses the filing of an amicus brief by Palmetto State Armory, the National Association for Gun Rights, and the Right to Bear Association with the US Supreme Court in support of Patrick Tate Admiak. Admiak, a decorated Navy veteran with no prior criminal history, is serving 20 years in federal prison for possessing inert and 'dummy' firearm parts that government witnesses stated could not fire projectiles. The brief argues that the Fourth Circuit's dismissal of Admiak's Second Amendment claim was improper, failing to conduct historical analysis or require the government to prove its case, and that items incapable of firing projectiles are not 'dangerous and unusual' under Heller.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has overturned a long-standing California gun law that effectively banned open carry in counties with over 200,000 residents. The ruling, based on the Bruen framework, found the ban incompatible with the Second Amendment by failing to meet the text, history, and tradition test. While this is a significant victory for gun rights advocates, it does not immediately legalize open carry statewide, as the decision is subject to further legal processes.

Colion Noir provides a critical analysis of a federal appeals court ruling that found California's ban on open firearm carry unconstitutional. He delves into the legal standards for firearm restrictions, historical context of gun control, and the psychological aspects of carrying firearms. Noir also touches on practical considerations for concealed versus open carry and the historical legislative responses in California.

This video discusses the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision to rehear the 'Baird v. Bonta' case en banc, overturning a previous three-judge panel ruling that found California's open carry ban unconstitutional in populous counties. The speaker expresses frustration with the Ninth Circuit's history of overturning Second Amendment victories and highlights the significance of this case for carrying rights.

This video from Armed Scholar provides an expert-level analysis of the Supreme Court granting review to Wolfford v. Lopez, a case challenging Hawaii's strict concealed carry restrictions enacted post-Bruin. It details the legal arguments, the DOJ's support for the challenge, and the unusual nature of the Supreme Court's intervention in an interlocutory case. The ruling is expected to clarify the scope of the Bruin holding regarding public carry rights.

William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law and a practicing attorney, provides expert guidance on how to legally respond if your vehicle is surrounded by a mob. He emphasizes understanding the nuances of self-defense laws, particularly concerning the use of force, and stresses that the primary goal should always be de-escalation and safe escape when possible. The instruction highlights the critical difference between property damage and threats to human life when justifying defensive actions.

This video, featuring legal expert William Kirk, delves into the complex legalities of using deadly force against law enforcement officers when faced with unlawful aggression. It clarifies the foundational principles of self-defense, including necessity, reasonableness, and proportionality, and outlines the four legal justifications for employing lethal force. The discussion highlights the protections afforded by the Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground laws, particularly within one's home, and differentiates between the legal right to self-defense and the tactical considerations of engaging with law enforcement.

This video features William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, an expert in firearms law, discussing the growing trend of county sheriffs and state associations opposing federal gun control measures. The primary focus is on Arkansas, detailing Act 1012 and Arkansas Code 21-1-904, which aim to prevent state cooperation with federal enforcement of certain firearms regulations, particularly the ATF's rule on pistol stabilizing braces.

William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, provides expert insights into ATF firearm inspection authority. He clarifies that the ATF cannot demand inspections of non-NFA firearms or NFA items without a warrant, dispelling common misconceptions about Fourth Amendment rights for firearm owners. The video emphasizes that FFLs have different inspection rules than private citizens.