Tom Gresham's GUNTALK - 4.26.15 Part A

Published on April 27, 2015
Duration: 44:45

Tom Gresham discusses the controversial push in some states to mandate firearm training for constitutional carry, arguing that requiring a permit to exercise a constitutional right is fundamentally wrong. He criticizes concealed carry instructors who support these mandates, suggesting it's driven by a desire to maintain business rather than genuine safety concerns. Gresham emphasizes that existing laws already penalize misuse of firearms, and mandatory training requirements can be a barrier to exercising a right.

Quick Summary

Mandatory firearm training for constitutional carry is controversial as it's viewed as requiring permission to exercise a constitutional right. Critics argue that existing laws already penalize firearm misuse, and such mandates can be a barrier to exercising fundamental rights, potentially driven by instructors' business interests.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction & Crimson Trace Laser Sights
  2. 00:25Gun Talk Radio Show Intro
  3. 00:56Topics: Politics, Ammo Availability
  4. 01:34Shooting Silencers with SIG
  5. 02:20Governor Against Silencers
  6. 03:00National Firearms Act (NFA) History
  7. 03:37Benefits of Quieter Guns
  8. 04:26Silencers Make Guns More Fun
  9. 05:05Rock Island Armory Grand Prize Giveaway
  10. 05:30Call with Bill: Training Mandates for Carry
  11. 06:18Tom's Opinion on Training Mandates
  12. 07:03Concealed Carry Instructors' Role
  13. 08:31Penalties for Misuse of Firearms
  14. 08:55Constitutional Carry States
  15. 09:24Educational Campaigns vs. Mandates
  16. 10:14Upcoming Guest: Legal Aftermath Expert
  17. 11:07Timney Triggers Advertisement
  18. 11:44Smith & Wesson Bodyguard Advertisement
  19. 12:11Springfield Armory Concealed Carry DVDs
  20. 12:37Laser Light Trainer Target Advertisement
  21. 13:22Guns & Gear TV Show Production
  22. 14:32Call with David: Sig P220 & M&P Pro
  23. 15:50David's New 308 Rifle Build
  24. 16:13Barrel Break-In Procedure for Rifles
  25. 17:53Mouser Action & Left-Handed Bolt
  26. 18:36Call with Marty: Ruger LCP 380 Noise
  27. 19:39Importance of Hearing Protection
  28. 20:41Advice on Hearing Protection Storage
  29. 21:21Importance of Eye Protection
  30. 22:45Gun Talk Radio Show Outro
  31. 23:23University of Iowa Blocks Gun Talk Website
  32. 24:27No Shrug Policy & Speaking Up
  33. 25:01Call with Chad: Concealed Carry Instructor Business Model
  34. 27:50Opportunity for Instructors in Constitutional Carry
  35. 30:23Springfield Armory XDM Advertisement
  36. 30:54Double Tap Ammunition Advertisement
  37. 31:26Fighting with the 1911 DVD
  38. 32:28WhereToShoot.org Resource
  39. 33:09Reminder: Hearing Protection is Crucial
  40. 33:25Call with Don: Interstate Carry Laws
  41. 33:57Handgunlaw.us Website Recommendation
  42. 34:53Call with Rodney: 10mm for Black Bears
  43. 35:1110mm Cartridge Recommendations
  44. 36:30Call with Dave: Suppressor Experience
  45. 37:08Shooting a Suppressed .22LR
  46. 37:59Suppressor Purchase Process & Trust
  47. 39:33Call with Jeff: Safety Concerns at a Shoot
  48. 41:14Smart Decision to Avoid Unsafe Situations
  49. 43:08Rule: No Alcohol While Shooting

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is mandatory firearm training for constitutional carry controversial?

Mandatory training for constitutional carry is controversial because it's seen as requiring individuals to ask permission to exercise a constitutional right. Critics argue that existing laws already penalize firearm misuse, and such mandates can be a barrier to exercising a fundamental right, potentially driven by business interests of instructors.

What are the arguments against concealed carry instructors supporting mandatory training?

Some concealed carry instructors are criticized for supporting mandatory training for constitutional carry, with suggestions that their motives are financial rather than purely safety-oriented. Opponents believe these instructors use scare tactics that align with gun control narratives, rather than promoting responsible firearm ownership.

What is the historical context of silencer regulation in the US?

Silencer regulation in the US dates back to the National Firearms Act (NFA) of 1934. This act restricted silencers, requiring forms and a $200 tax stamp. At the time, this tax was a significant cost relative to the price of a silencer, effectively acting as a ban for many.

What are the benefits of using silencers on firearms?

Silencers, often misunderstood, primarily reduce firearm noise. This makes shooting safer for hearing protection and more pleasant. They are not typically associated with criminal activity as often portrayed in media, but rather with responsible shooting practices and hearing conservation.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Gun Talk Media

View all →