1921 VS 1928 Thompson Machinegun (FullAuto)

This video compares the original pre-war Thompson submachine gun with the simplified wartime GI production model. It highlights the intricate features of the early Type 1, such as the Cutts compensator and finned barrel, versus the cost-effective design of the later M1/M1A1 variants. The wartime version significantly reduced production costs by omitting luxury features, making it more accessible for mass deployment.

This review covers the iconic Thompson Submachine Gun, detailing its history from WWI design to Prohibition-era fame and WWII modifications. Hickok45 demonstrates its full-auto capability, compares different models (1921 vs. 1928A1), and explains its engineering, including the friction-delayed recoil system and caliber choice of .45 ACP. The video also touches on magazine types, field stripping, and its historical impact on law enforcement and legislation.

This review delves into John Thompson's original 1919 prototype submachine gun, the precursor to the iconic 'Tommy Gun'. The prototype, brought to Colt in 1919, featured a .45 ACP caliber, an 'X' serial number, and lacked a stock or sights, serving as the 'pattern gun'. It evolved into the Model 1921, which incorporated a high-polish finish, finned barrel, compensator, stock, and drum magazine compatibility. Early production models were expensive and primarily used by gangsters and law enforcement.

This YouTube Shorts video offers a review and comparison of the full auto and semi-automatic versions of the Thompson submachine gun. The title suggests the full-auto variant may not perform as well as its semi-automatic counterpart, indicating a focus on practical performance and user experience. The content likely involves demonstrating the firearms and offering an expert opinion on their functionality and effectiveness.

This video compares three Thompson submachine gun variants: the 1921, 1921/28, and M1A1, focusing on their rates of fire and shootability. The 1921 fires fastest at 960 rpm and is surprisingly controllable, while the 1921/28 (830 rpm) is slightly harder to manage. The M1A1, with the slowest rate of fire (655 rpm), is deemed the most difficult to control due to its lack of a compensator. The original 1921 is preferred for its shooting experience despite less refined sights.

This review of the full-auto Thompson submachine gun highlights a unique design flaw: the weep hole's placement behind the rear sight. During full-auto fire, compressed air blows directly into the shooter's eye, making it difficult to maintain sight picture. The video contrasts this with the AR-15's weep hole placement, which avoids this issue.

The Freedom Ordnance FG-15 offers a unique trigger crank mechanism integrated into an AR-15 grip, allowing for rapid firing by rotating a deployable crank. This piston-driven system engages the trigger bar mechanically, providing a novel approach to firearm modification. While innovative, its potential NFA implications and mechanical complexity suggest it's for experienced users.

This review showcases the PKM 7.62x54R machine gun, highlighting its full-auto capability and belt-fed mechanism. The video demonstrates the loading process and sustained fire, offering close-up views of the weapon's internals and ammunition. The host provides positive closing impressions, recommending the PKM to enthusiasts, and includes bonus footage of a Barrett .50 caliber rifle.

This video clarifies the terminology between 'silencer' and 'suppressor,' noting 'silencer' is the original patented term. It demonstrates that suppressors reduce sound to around 130 dB, not silence, and discusses their role as hearing protection tools rather than crime enhancers. The process of legally acquiring a suppressor under the NFA, including the $200 tax stamp and lengthy wait times, is detailed, advocating for the Hearing Protection Act.

Using a suppressor on a home defense firearm is generally inadvisable due to the severe noise levels that can cause hearing damage and disorientation. This can lead to dangerous miscommunication with household members, potentially mistaking the defender for an intruder. While suppressors offer benefits, their use indoors without proper precautions poses significant risks to oneself and others.