338 ARC vs 8.6 Blackout: Worse Than I Thought

This YouTube video features Bill from WC Ranch conducting a chrono test and side-by-side comparison of the .300 HAM'R cartridge. The comparison includes its performance against the well-known 7.62x39mm and the classic .30-30 WIN rifle cartridges. The video likely delves into ballistic data, terminal performance, and practical applications of these different calibers, offering insights for firearm enthusiasts interested in cartridge performance and rifle comparisons.

This video provides an expert overview of the 30 Epic cartridge, presented by Michael from Olympus Arms, Inc. The cartridge is highlighted for its significant power increase over 5.56 NATO, offering nearly double the performance. It's designed for AR-15 platforms, fitting double-stack magazines, and boasts impressive ballistics with a 110-grain projectile achieving 2,800 fps from a 13-inch barrel. The speaker's deep understanding of ballistics and platform compatibility signals high expertise.

This YouTube Short focuses on a comparison between two rifle cartridges: .338 Arc and 8.6 Blackout. The title explicitly highlights a "problem" with one or both, suggesting an evaluation or critique of their performance, capabilities, or suitability for specific applications. As a short-form video, it likely offers a concise overview or highlights a key point of contention between these two calibers, potentially touching on factors like ballistics, recoil, or practical use.

This YouTube video explores the practical applications and reasons for choosing the 6.5 Grendel cartridge. The title suggests a discussion focusing on the advantages and use cases of this specific rifle caliber, potentially comparing it to other options or detailing scenarios where it excels. Viewers can expect insights into ballistic performance, typical firearms that chamber it, and its suitability for various shooting disciplines or hunting applications.

This video explores the .30 Super Carry cartridge, evaluating its potential to become a mainstream self-defense round. The title suggests a discussion on whether it's a "one-and-done" novelty or a cartridge with lasting viability. The analysis will likely cover its performance, comparisons to existing calibers, and its suitability for concealed carry and self-defense applications.

This YouTube video features a comparison between the .460 Smith & Wesson cartridge and watermelons. The content likely showcases the terminal ballistics and destructive power of the potent .460 S&W, demonstrating its impact on a common, albeit unconventional, target. The video is expected to appeal to firearm enthusiasts interested in powerful handgun cartridges and ballistic demonstrations.

This video provides an expert-level comparison between the .44 Magnum and .50 Action Express calibers, featuring a Magnum Research Desert Eagle and a Ruger Super Redhawk. The host, demonstrating high authority, conducts a series of tests including penetration through lumber, steel, sand, and concrete, followed by ballistic gel testing with hollow-point rounds. The analysis highlights differences in muzzle energy, penetration, and wound channel, ultimately questioning the cost-to-performance ratio of the .50 AE.

This video provides an in-depth, experimental comparison between .223 Remington and 5.56x45mm NATO cartridges, utilizing a chronograph and various barrier materials. The host, demonstrating high expertise through empirical testing, reveals significant performance differences, particularly in barrier penetration, with 5.56x45mm NATO generally outperforming .223 Remington.

This video from Banana Ballistics explores the surprising lethality of "less lethal" shotgun ammunition. Through rigorous testing with ballistic gel and plywood, the host demonstrates that rounds like bean bags and high-velocity .410 rubber buckshot can cause significant damage, challenging the common perception of these rounds as entirely non-lethal. The testing highlights the importance of understanding ammunition performance beyond its intended classification.

This video provides an objective comparison of 9mm Luger, .40 S&W, and .45 ACP calibers through a series of rigorous tests including lumber, sand, concrete, and ballistics gel. The host, leveraging specialized equipment like a Garmin Xero C1 Pro chronograph and digital calipers, presents data on velocity, penetration, and expansion. While .40 S&W showed competitive performance in some tests, the analysis concludes with a preference for 9mm due to its higher capacity and lower recoil, highlighting the importance of practical considerations beyond raw ballistics.