Hockey puck penetration - 9mm vs. 5.56mm

Published on June 20, 2023
Duration: 0:15

This video compares the penetration capabilities of 9mm and 5.56mm rounds using hockey pucks as a ballistic medium. The 9mm round, fired from a Ruger LC Carbine, was stopped by the first puck, while the 5.56mm round from an AR-15 easily penetrated multiple pucks. The test highlights the significant difference in velocity and sectional density between the two calibers.

Quick Summary

In a hockey puck penetration test, the 9mm round from a Ruger LC Carbine stopped in the first puck. Conversely, the 5.56mm round from an AR-15 easily penetrated multiple pucks, highlighting the significant difference in ballistic performance.

Chapters

  1. 00:009mm Penetration Test Setup
  2. 00:069mm Penetration Results
  3. 00:095.56mm Penetration Test Setup
  4. 00:125.56mm Penetration Results

Frequently Asked Questions

How did the 9mm perform in the hockey puck penetration test?

The 9mm round, fired from a Ruger LC Carbine, was stopped by the very first hockey puck. The bullet expanded and lodged within the rubber, failing to penetrate to the subsequent pucks.

What were the results of the 5.56mm penetration test against hockey pucks?

The 5.56mm round, fired from an AR-15, demonstrated significantly higher penetration. It easily passed through the first puck and continued through multiple additional pucks in the stack.

What is the main takeaway from the 9mm vs. 5.56mm hockey puck test?

The test clearly illustrates the substantial difference in ballistic performance, specifically penetration power, between a pistol caliber (9mm) and a rifle caliber (5.56mm) due to variations in velocity and projectile design.

What firearms were used in the hockey puck penetration test?

The test utilized a Ruger LC Carbine chambered in 9mm and an AR-15 style rifle chambered in 5.56mm, which was equipped with a Holosun optic and an Olight weapon light.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Guns Blazing Ranch

View all →