Less Lethal Ammo Is Surprisingly Lethal?

This test compares subsonic and supersonic .22LR ammunition lethality using Clear Ballistics gelatin and a cloth barrier. Results indicate that heavy subsonic FMJ rounds can penetrate beyond the FBI's 12-inch minimum, challenging the assumption that they are less deadly than supersonic hollow points. The supersonic hollow point demonstrated expected mushrooming.

This video provides a direct, visual comparison between the .45 AUTO and 10mm AUTO calibers, featuring a 1911-style pistol and a CZ-style pistol. The demonstration includes loading procedures and live-fire performance on an outdoor range, highlighting differences in recoil and sound. The content is presented by an experienced individual, offering practical insights into these popular handgun cartridges.

This video from Guns Blazing Ranch provides a direct comparison between 5.56mm M193 and M855 'green tip' ammunition. Demonstrations show the significant difference in penetration power against a cinder block, with M855 exhibiting superior destructive capability. The content highlights practical differences relevant to firearm enthusiasts.

This video features test firing of an Armscor 9mm pistol. The shooter is comparing the accuracy of handloaded ammunition against standard FMJ (Full Metal Jacket) rounds. The content focuses on the practical application of different ammunition types in a specific firearm model and caliber, likely aimed at enthusiasts interested in reloading and firearm performance.

This YouTube video offers a direct comparison between subsonic and supersonic ammunition for the .22LR caliber. The content likely delves into the performance differences, potential applications, and characteristics of each type of .22LR round. Viewers can expect insights into how the speed of the bullet affects factors like noise levels, recoil, and terminal ballistics, making it a valuable resource for .22LR enthusiasts considering ammunition choices.

This video analyzes the performance and characteristics of shotgun slugs versus straight-wall cartridges. It likely explores the ballistic differences, terminal ballistics, and potential applications for each type of ammunition, possibly in the context of hunting or self-defense. The comparison aims to provide viewers with a clear understanding of which option might be more suitable for specific scenarios involving shotguns or firearms chambered in straight-wall cartridges.

This comparison tests the .50 AE Desert Eagle against the .44 Magnum in various barrier tests, including wood, steel, sand, and concrete. While both calibers showed impressive power, the .50 AE demonstrated superior performance in ballistic gel with deeper penetration and a larger wound channel. Ultimately, the video questions if the .50 AE's marginal gains justify its significantly higher cost per round compared to the versatile .44 Magnum.

This video provides a detailed comparison between .223 Remington and 5.56 NATO ammunition, demonstrating their performance differences through rigorous barrier testing. While visually identical, 5.56 NATO shows a slight advantage in velocity and energy. Crucially, 5.56 NATO exhibits superior barrier penetration against lumber and steel, whereas .223 Remington struggles. Specialized rounds like M855A1 also show enhanced performance against sand barriers.

This video compares 9mm, .40 S&W, and .45 ACP through various barrier tests including lumber, sand, and concrete, alongside ballistics gel testing. While all calibers performed similarly through most barriers, the .40 S&W showed slightly better penetration and expansion in ballistics gel. The host ultimately favors 9mm due to its lower recoil and higher capacity, despite the .40 S&W's respectable performance.

This video provides a practical, experimental comparison between .308 Winchester and 7.62x51mm NATO cartridges, focusing on their ability to penetrate mild steel plates. The host, demonstrating significant expertise in ballistics, conducts a controlled test using different rifle barrel lengths and custom equipment to measure impact depths. The results reveal a surprising outcome where 7.62 NATO demonstrated superior penetration over .308 Winchester, attributed to potential differences in bullet construction.