The Fastest Bullet I've Ever Shot!

This YouTube Short focuses on a comparison between two rifle cartridges: .338 Arc and 8.6 Blackout. The title explicitly highlights a "problem" with one or both, suggesting an evaluation or critique of their performance, capabilities, or suitability for specific applications. As a short-form video, it likely offers a concise overview or highlights a key point of contention between these two calibers, potentially touching on factors like ballistics, recoil, or practical use.

This video compares the destructive power of a .50 BMG rifle round against a shotgun slug, specifically by testing their impact on a pumpkin. The title highlights the .50 BMG and 'Balote de Espingarda' (shotgun slug) as the two projectiles being compared for their ability to destroy the target. The content appears to be a direct, visual comparison of these two distinct ammunition types and their terminal ballistics.

This barrier testing video compares the 350 Legend and 7.62x39 calibers against lumber, sand, concrete, and steel. While both calibers showed comparable performance across most barriers, with neither fully penetrating the sand or concrete block with plywood backing, the 7.62x39 was ultimately declared the winner of the challenge by the host.

This YouTube video compares the .270 Winchester Short Magnum (WSM) to its century-old predecessor, the .270 Winchester, and the more modern 6.8 Western cartridge. The video aims to help viewers determine if the .270 WSM is a necessary addition to their firearm collection by evaluating its performance and utility against these established and contemporary options. The analysis likely covers ballistic data, practical applications, and overall value proposition for hunters and rifle enthusiasts.

This video, titled 'Is 7mm PRC a joke?', appears to be a critical or opinion-based evaluation of the 7mm PRC ammunition and potentially firearms chambered in it. The description encourages viewers to subscribe to become an "OUTLAW" and provides links to other videos, the channel's YouTube page, Instagram, and Patreon, suggesting a regular content creator in the firearms niche. The tone hints at a potentially controversial or strongly opinionated take on the subject matter.

This comparison evaluates four straight wall cartridges: .45-70 Gov't, .450 Bushmaster, .350 Legend, and .360 Buckhammer. The .45-70 offers significant knockdown power, while the .450 Bushmaster is AR-platform friendly. The .350 Legend provides low recoil ideal for new shooters, and the newer .360 Buckhammer offers higher velocities than the .350 Legend. Range testing and ballistic gel comparisons highlight their performance for deer hunting.

This video rigorously tests the self-defense capabilities of various airguns against a realistic human head ballistic target. The expert instructor demonstrates that low-power BB guns like the Daisy Red Rider offer minimal threat, while even full-auto CO2 BB guns fail to penetrate the skull. However, a high-velocity Gamo pellet rifle proves capable of causing significant damage, cracking the skull. The instructor concludes that BB guns are unsuitable for self-defense, and while pellet rifles are dangerous, they lack the immediate stopping power of conventional firearms.

This video tests the BulletSafe VP3 Level IIIA vest against various calibers up to .44 Magnum using a realistic human torso dummy. While the vest stopped all tested rounds, including a .44 Magnum and 12-gauge buckshot, significant backface deformation and blunt force trauma were evident, especially with higher-energy rounds. The dummy's shoulder blade was broken by buckshot, and severe bruising was indicated by the .44 Magnum impact.

This review of the Crosman DPMS SBR full-auto BB gun highlights its realistic AR-15 SBR aesthetics and select-fire capability. The host demonstrates its operation, including loading with a speedloader and the dual CO2 power system. Performance metrics like 1400 RPM and 430 FPS are discussed, along with its accuracy and destructive potential on targets like watermelons. The device is recommended for realistic training or plinking where live firearms are impractical.

This video tests the effectiveness and dangers of using a flare gun for self-defense. While a flare gun can ignite materials and cause internal damage to a ballistic torso, its single-shot capacity, slow reload, and high risk of starting fires make it an irresponsible and dangerous choice for defense. The test highlights the unpredictable nature and significant fire hazard associated with using flare guns in a defensive scenario.