The M&P Isn’t It (After 5,000 Rounds)

Published on April 24, 2026
Duration: 14:24

After 5,000 rounds, the reviewer finds the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 Compact to be reliable but ultimately less preferable than the Glock 19 for concealed carry. Key criticisms include a poor proprietary optic mounting system, an aggressive grip texture that can be uncomfortable for daily carry, and a long, mushy trigger pull. While accuracy is deemed comparable to competitors, the reviewer highlights the Glock's superior ergonomics and trigger feel for defensive use.

Quick Summary

After 5,000 rounds, the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 Compact is found to be reliable but less ideal for concealed carry than the Glock 19. Criticisms include a faulty optic mount, an uncomfortable grip texture, and a poor trigger. While accurate, the Glock 19's ergonomics and trigger make it the preferred choice for defensive use.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: M&P Not For Me
  2. 00:11Community Reaction & Video Purpose
  3. 00:265,000 Rounds: Glock vs M&P Comparison
  4. 00:56Pros and Cons Overview
  5. 01:05Concealed Carry Testing Period
  6. 01:14Reliability Testing Results
  7. 01:37Direct Comparison: Glock 19 vs M&P 2.0 Compact
  8. 02:09Training Matters More Than Gear
  9. 03:30Major Negatives of the M&P
  10. 03:39Optic Mounting Plate Issues
  11. 04:20M&P Pros: American Made
  12. 04:38Accuracy Testing and Observations
  13. 05:40Accuracy Confirmation Bias
  14. 06:23Carry Considerations: Grip Texture
  15. 07:43Suppressor Height Night Sights
  16. 09:02Trigger Issues: M&P vs Glock
  17. 11:11Trigger as Biggest Issue
  18. 11:52Overall Recommendation: Glock Preferred
  19. 12:40Viewer Feedback & Conclusion

Frequently Asked Questions

What were the main criticisms of the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 Compact after 5,000 rounds?

The primary criticisms of the M&P 2.0 Compact after extensive testing included its unreliable proprietary optic mounting system, an overly aggressive grip texture uncomfortable for daily carry, and a long, mushy trigger pull that is less efficient for defensive shooting compared to the Glock 19.

How did the M&P 2.0 Compact perform in terms of reliability?

The M&P 2.0 Compact proved to be highly reliable over 5,000 rounds, functioning well even with duty ammunition like Federal HSTs, passing this aspect with flying colors.

Is the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 Compact accurate?

Yes, the reviewer found the M&P 2.0 Compact to be as accurate as its competitors, suggesting that concerns about its accuracy are often based on confirmation bias rather than objective performance.

Why does the reviewer prefer the Glock 19 over the M&P 2.0 Compact for concealed carry?

The reviewer prefers the Glock 19 for concealed carry due to its superior ergonomics, particularly a less aggressive grip texture, and a more consistent, shorter trigger pull, which are crucial for comfort and effective defensive use.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Trench Grenade

View all →