Top 5 Guns To Get Rid Of

Published on January 10, 2024
Duration: 4:47

This video offers a critical review of five firearms the speaker recommends selling, based on his extensive experience as a collector and trader. He prioritizes practicality, reliability, and safety, advising viewers to divest from firearms that present safety concerns, are overly specialized, or lack modern utility. The review highlights specific issues like the Sig Sauer P320's drop safety and the S&W 500's impracticality.

Quick Summary

An experienced firearm collector recommends selling the Kel-Tec Sub-2000, Sig Sauer P320, Smith & Wesson 500, and Arsenal 2011 A1 due to concerns about reliability, safety, and practicality. He stresses that personal trust in a firearm's safety is paramount, and novelty or outdated designs should be replaced with more dependable options.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction & Speaker's History
  2. 01:01Kel-Tec Sub-2000 Review
  3. 01:50Sig Sauer P320 Concerns
  4. 02:12Smith & Wesson 500 Novelty
  5. 03:00Arsenal 2011 A1 Critique
  6. 03:32Hollywood Bodyguard Firearms Commentary

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the Sig Sauer P320 recommended for sale?

The speaker advises selling the Sig Sauer P320 due to well-documented historical drop-safety concerns. He emphasizes that if a firearm cannot be trusted to be safe under all conditions, it should not be owned, regardless of manufacturer fixes or updates.

Is the Smith & Wesson 500 practical for self-defense?

No, the speaker considers the Smith & Wesson 500 a novelty item. He argues that its .500 S&W Magnum caliber is excessively powerful, unpleasant to shoot, and prohibitively expensive for regular practice, making .44 Magnum or .357 Magnum more practical choices.

What are the main criticisms of the Kel-Tec Sub-2000?

While initially liked for its folding design and magazine compatibility, the Kel-Tec Sub-2000 is now seen as obsolete compared to AR pistols. The speaker also experienced jamming issues, diminishing its reliability as a primary tool.

What is the speaker's overall philosophy on firearm ownership?

The speaker prioritizes practicality, reliability, and safety in firearm ownership. He advocates for divesting from firearms that present safety risks, are overly specialized novelties, or lack modern utility, based on extensive experience in collecting and trading.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from GFG

View all →