Two Very Different 7.62 Rifles ~ The M14 and AK47

Published on October 23, 2021
Duration: 18:43

This video compares the M14 rifle chambered in 7.62 NATO and the AK-47 in 7.62x39mm, highlighting their distinct design philosophies and historical contexts. The M14, developed for long-range European combat, proved ill-suited for the jungle warfare of Vietnam due to its weight and unmanageable full-auto fire. Conversely, the AK-47, designed for tactical close-quarters combat with a focus on reliability and ease of use, became a globally ubiquitous firearm. The presenter demonstrates shooting both rifles, emphasizing the AK-47's superior controllability in full-automatic fire and its effectiveness in its intended role.

Quick Summary

The M14 rifle, chambered in 7.62 NATO, was designed for long-range combat, but proved unwieldy and uncontrollable in full-automatic fire, especially in the humid jungle environment of Vietnam. In contrast, the AK-47, chambered in 7.62x39mm, was engineered for tactical, close-quarters engagements, prioritizing reliability and ease of use, making it a globally ubiquitous and effective firearm.

Chapters

  1. 00:01Introduction: Two 7.62 Rifles
  2. 00:20The AK-47: Origins and Deployment
  3. 00:52The M14: 7.62 NATO Cartridge
  4. 01:11Design Philosophies: M14 vs AK-47
  5. 03:01Soviet Tactical Evolution
  6. 04:04Tactical Warfare Concepts
  7. 05:56Soviet Submachine Gun Doctrine
  8. 06:39US Adoption of Full Auto Rifles
  9. 07:05M14's Full Auto Ineffectiveness
  10. 08:01M14 in Vietnam
  11. 09:20Chinese Type 56-2 AK-47 Variant
  12. 10:21Stamped vs. Milled Receivers
  13. 11:12Global Proliferation of AK-47
  14. 12:43AK-74 and Cartridge Evolution
  15. 13:55Ammunition Burden Factor
  16. 14:197.62x39mm: A Stellar Achievement
  17. 15:01Shooting Demonstration
  18. 16:13M14 Shooting Impressions
  19. 16:50AK-47 Shooting Impressions
  20. 17:12Combat Disadvantage in Vietnam
  21. 17:53Conclusion: 7.62x39mm vs 7.62 NATO

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the primary differences in design philosophy between the M14 and the AK-47?

The M14 was designed for long-range, open-country combat, emphasizing accuracy and bayonet use, reflecting traditional European warfare tactics. The AK-47, however, was developed for tactical, close-quarters combat, prioritizing reliability, ease of use, and full-automatic fire capability, influenced by the effectiveness of submachine guns in World War II.

Why was the M14 rifle considered ineffective in Vietnam?

The M14's heavy weight, coupled with its unmanageable full-automatic fire and susceptibility to environmental damage like stock warping in humid jungle conditions, made it poorly suited for the close-quarters, often wet environment of Vietnam.

What led to the widespread global proliferation of the AK-47?

Following World War II, Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev in 1956 mandated that all communist countries receive the plans and technical knowledge to build AK-47s. This initiative ensured a standardized, highly capable rifle across the Warsaw Pact and beyond.

How does the ammunition weight differ between the 7.62x39mm and 7.62 NATO cartridges?

The 7.62x39mm cartridge is significantly lighter than the 7.62 NATO. This weight difference allows soldiers to carry substantially more ammunition, enhancing their combat effectiveness without the need for frequent resupply, a critical factor in military logistics.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from GunBlue490

View all →