Why The US Army REALLY Said NO To Glock!

Published on January 25, 2025
Duration: 8:04

The US Army rejected the Glock 19X for the XM7 Modular Handgun System trials primarily because it was not considered a true modular handgun system as required. While Glock offered a solution with interchangeable slides and grips, it necessitated purchasing multiple firearms to achieve different configurations, unlike the SIG P320's removable trigger pack design. This modularity, combined with cost considerations, led the Army to select the P320.

Quick Summary

The US Army rejected the Glock 19X for the XM7 Modular Handgun System trials primarily because it was not considered a true modular handgun system. Unlike the SIG P320's removable trigger pack, achieving different configurations with the Glock 19X would have required purchasing multiple firearms, leading to a significantly higher cost per soldier.

Chapters

  1. 00:09Introduction to XM7 Trials
  2. 00:41XM17 Modular Handgun System Competition Details
  3. 01:09Army's Requirements: Accuracy & Reliability
  4. 01:17Specific Performance Metrics
  5. 01:46The Thumb Safety Requirement
  6. 02:20Cost Impact of Thumb Safety
  7. 02:38Scale of Army Handgun Procurement
  8. 02:57Why Glock Was Only 'Acceptable'
  9. 03:00Glock 19X Not a Modular System
  10. 03:13Definition of Modular Handgun System
  11. 03:36Glock's Approach to Modularity
  12. 04:02The Problem with Glock's Modularity
  13. 04:15SIG P320 Modularity vs. Glock
  14. 04:49Cost Comparison: Glock vs. SIG
  15. 05:15Significant Cost Difference Per Soldier
  16. 05:26Requirements vs. Performance
  17. 05:42Final Reasons for Glock Rejection
  18. 06:10Glock Didn't Listen to Instructions

Frequently Asked Questions

What were the primary reasons the US Army rejected the Glock 19X for the XM7 trials?

The main reasons the US Army rejected the Glock 19X were that it was not considered a true modular handgun system as required by the trials, and the cost to achieve multiple configurations was significantly higher than the SIG P320.

Did the US Army require a thumb safety for the XM7 handgun trials?

Yes, a thumb safety was a requirement for the US Army's XM7 Modular Handgun System trials. The SIG P320, which was selected, came with a thumb safety for military use, and Glock did offer a thumb safety on their 19X submission.

How did the modularity of the SIG P320 differ from Glock's 19X submission?

The SIG P320 featured a removable trigger pack, allowing one firearm to be easily configured for different sizes. Glock's 19X, while offering interchangeable slides and grips, would have required purchasing multiple firearms to achieve similar size variations, making it less modular in the Army's view.

What was the estimated cost difference per soldier between the SIG P320 and Glock 19X for the Army?

The SIG P320 system was estimated to cost around $1,000 per soldier for multiple configurations. In contrast, the Glock 19X, requiring separate firearm purchases for different sizes, was estimated to cost approximately $1,800 per soldier, making the SIG P320 far more cost-effective.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from GFG

View all →