Worst Guns I've Owned

Published on January 9, 2026
Duration: 16:26

This video offers a critical, self-deprecating review of firearms the creator has owned and regretted. Drawing on extensive experience, the speaker details issues ranging from reliability and ergonomics with the Walther PPK and Inter Ordnance AK to the practical limitations of the KelTec Sub-2000 and Daniel Defense DDM4. The insights provided are valuable for new and experienced firearm owners alike, highlighting common pitfalls in firearm selection and modification.

Quick Summary

Firearms expert reviews highlight common pitfalls in gun ownership, detailing issues with the Walther PPK (recoil, reliability), IO AKs (manufacturing defects), KelTec Sub-2000 (optic mounting), Lionheart LH9 (trigger flaws), and DD M4 (excessive weight). Learn from these experiences to avoid costly mistakes.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction & Sponsorship
  2. 01:47Walther PPK Review
  3. 03:42Inter Ordnance (IO) AK Issues
  4. 05:43KelTec Sub-2000 Challenges
  5. 08:48Lionheart LH9 Criticisms
  6. 11:59Daniel Defense DDM4 Weight Issue

Frequently Asked Questions

What are common issues with the Walther PPK?

The Walther PPK is often criticized for being heavy for its size, experiencing reliability problems, and having harsh recoil. Ejection patterns can also be problematic for left-handed shooters, causing discomfort or malfunctions.

Why are Inter Ordnance AKs considered problematic?

Inter Ordnance (IO) AK-pattern rifles frequently suffer from significant manufacturing defects. Common issues include improper headspacing, poorly installed rivets, and trigger group malfunctions that can lead to unsafe firing behavior.

What challenges exist with the KelTec Sub-2000?

Early KelTec Sub-2000 models can be difficult to outfit with optics without specialized aftermarket parts like the Red Lion Precision handguard. Some users have reported component failures and a general lack of long-term durability.

Is the Daniel Defense DDM4 a bad rifle?

The DDM4 itself is generally well-regarded, but the specific 18-inch barrel configuration discussed made the rifle excessively heavy (over 10 lbs) without offering a substantial practical accuracy advantage, highlighting a poor weight-to-performance trade-off.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Brass Facts

View all →